Patch "[PATCH] sparc64: Fix userspace FPU register corruptions." has been added to the 4.1-stable tree

[<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>]

This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    [PATCH] sparc64: Fix userspace FPU register corruptions.

to the 4.1-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     sparc64-fix-userspace-fpu-register-corruptions.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.1 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.


>From foo@baz Thu Aug 13 14:27:02 PDT 2015
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2015 19:13:25 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] sparc64: Fix userspace FPU register corruptions.

From: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>

[ Upstream commit 44922150d87cef616fd183220d43d8fde4d41390 ]

If we have a series of events from userpsace, with %fprs=FPRS_FEF,
like follows:

ETRAP
	ETRAP
		VIS_ENTRY(fprs=0x4)
		VIS_EXIT
		RTRAP (kernel FPU restore with fpu_saved=0x4)
	RTRAP

We will not restore the user registers that were clobbered by the FPU
using kernel code in the inner-most trap.

Traps allocate FPU save slots in the thread struct, and FPU using
sequences save the "dirty" FPU registers only.

This works at the initial trap level because all of the registers
get recorded into the top-level FPU save area, and we'll return
to userspace with the FPU disabled so that any FPU use by the user
will take an FPU disabled trap wherein we'll load the registers
back up properly.

But this is not how trap returns from kernel to kernel operate.

The simplest fix for this bug is to always save all FPU register state
for anything other than the top-most FPU save area.

Getting rid of the optimized inner-slot FPU saving code ends up
making VISEntryHalf degenerate into plain VISEntry.

Longer term we need to do something smarter to reinstate the partial
save optimizations.  Perhaps the fundament error is having trap entry
and exit allocate FPU save slots and restore register state.  Instead,
the VISEntry et al. calls should be doing that work.

This bug is about two decades old.

Reported-by: James Y Knight <jyknight@google.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 arch/sparc/include/asm/visasm.h |   16 ++-------
 arch/sparc/lib/NG4memcpy.S      |    5 ++
 arch/sparc/lib/VISsave.S        |   67 +---------------------------------------
 arch/sparc/lib/ksyms.c          |    4 --
 4 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 81 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/sparc/include/asm/visasm.h
+++ b/arch/sparc/include/asm/visasm.h
@@ -28,16 +28,10 @@
  * Must preserve %o5 between VISEntryHalf and VISExitHalf */
 
 #define VISEntryHalf					\
-	rd		%fprs, %o5;			\
-	andcc		%o5, FPRS_FEF, %g0;		\
-	be,pt		%icc, 297f;			\
-	 sethi		%hi(298f), %g7;			\
-	sethi		%hi(VISenterhalf), %g1;		\
-	jmpl		%g1 + %lo(VISenterhalf), %g0;	\
-	 or		%g7, %lo(298f), %g7;		\
-	clr		%o5;				\
-297:	wr		%o5, FPRS_FEF, %fprs;		\
-298:
+	VISEntry
+
+#define VISExitHalf					\
+	VISExit
 
 #define VISEntryHalfFast(fail_label)			\
 	rd		%fprs, %o5;			\
@@ -47,7 +41,7 @@
 	ba,a,pt		%xcc, fail_label;		\
 297:	wr		%o5, FPRS_FEF, %fprs;
 
-#define VISExitHalf					\
+#define VISExitHalfFast					\
 	wr		%o5, 0, %fprs;
 
 #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
--- a/arch/sparc/lib/NG4memcpy.S
+++ b/arch/sparc/lib/NG4memcpy.S
@@ -240,8 +240,11 @@ FUNC_NAME:	/* %o0=dst, %o1=src, %o2=len
 	add		%o0, 0x40, %o0
 	bne,pt		%icc, 1b
 	 LOAD(prefetch, %g1 + 0x200, #n_reads_strong)
+#ifdef NON_USER_COPY
+	VISExitHalfFast
+#else
 	VISExitHalf
-
+#endif
 	brz,pn		%o2, .Lexit
 	 cmp		%o2, 19
 	ble,pn		%icc, .Lsmall_unaligned
--- a/arch/sparc/lib/VISsave.S
+++ b/arch/sparc/lib/VISsave.S
@@ -44,9 +44,8 @@ vis1:	ldub		[%g6 + TI_FPSAVED], %g3
 
 	 stx		%g3, [%g6 + TI_GSR]
 2:	add		%g6, %g1, %g3
-	cmp		%o5, FPRS_DU
-	be,pn		%icc, 6f
-	 sll		%g1, 3, %g1
+	mov		FPRS_DU | FPRS_DL | FPRS_FEF, %o5
+	sll		%g1, 3, %g1
 	stb		%o5, [%g3 + TI_FPSAVED]
 	rd		%gsr, %g2
 	add		%g6, %g1, %g3
@@ -80,65 +79,3 @@ vis1:	ldub		[%g6 + TI_FPSAVED], %g3
 	.align		32
 80:	jmpl		%g7 + %g0, %g0
 	 nop
-
-6:	ldub		[%g3 + TI_FPSAVED], %o5
-	or		%o5, FPRS_DU, %o5
-	add		%g6, TI_FPREGS+0x80, %g2
-	stb		%o5, [%g3 + TI_FPSAVED]
-
-	sll		%g1, 5, %g1
-	add		%g6, TI_FPREGS+0xc0, %g3
-	wr		%g0, FPRS_FEF, %fprs
-	membar		#Sync
-	stda		%f32, [%g2 + %g1] ASI_BLK_P
-	stda		%f48, [%g3 + %g1] ASI_BLK_P
-	membar		#Sync
-	ba,pt		%xcc, 80f
-	 nop
-
-	.align		32
-80:	jmpl		%g7 + %g0, %g0
-	 nop
-
-	.align		32
-VISenterhalf:
-	ldub		[%g6 + TI_FPDEPTH], %g1
-	brnz,a,pn	%g1, 1f
-	 cmp		%g1, 1
-	stb		%g0, [%g6 + TI_FPSAVED]
-	stx		%fsr, [%g6 + TI_XFSR]
-	clr		%o5
-	jmpl		%g7 + %g0, %g0
-	 wr		%g0, FPRS_FEF, %fprs
-
-1:	bne,pn		%icc, 2f
-	 srl		%g1, 1, %g1
-	ba,pt		%xcc, vis1
-	 sub		%g7, 8, %g7
-2:	addcc		%g6, %g1, %g3
-	sll		%g1, 3, %g1
-	andn		%o5, FPRS_DU, %g2
-	stb		%g2, [%g3 + TI_FPSAVED]
-
-	rd		%gsr, %g2
-	add		%g6, %g1, %g3
-	stx		%g2, [%g3 + TI_GSR]
-	add		%g6, %g1, %g2
-	stx		%fsr, [%g2 + TI_XFSR]
-	sll		%g1, 5, %g1
-3:	andcc		%o5, FPRS_DL, %g0
-	be,pn		%icc, 4f
-	 add		%g6, TI_FPREGS, %g2
-
-	add		%g6, TI_FPREGS+0x40, %g3
-	membar		#Sync
-	stda		%f0, [%g2 + %g1] ASI_BLK_P
-	stda		%f16, [%g3 + %g1] ASI_BLK_P
-	membar		#Sync
-	ba,pt		%xcc, 4f
-	 nop
-
-	.align		32
-4:	and		%o5, FPRS_DU, %o5
-	jmpl		%g7 + %g0, %g0
-	 wr		%o5, FPRS_FEF, %fprs
--- a/arch/sparc/lib/ksyms.c
+++ b/arch/sparc/lib/ksyms.c
@@ -135,10 +135,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(copy_user_page);
 void VISenter(void);
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(VISenter);
 
-/* CRYPTO code needs this */
-void VISenterhalf(void);
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(VISenterhalf);
-
 extern void xor_vis_2(unsigned long, unsigned long *, unsigned long *);
 extern void xor_vis_3(unsigned long, unsigned long *, unsigned long *,
 		unsigned long *);


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from davem@davemloft.net are

queue-4.1/sparc64-fix-userspace-fpu-register-corruptions.patch