From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: grygorii.strashko@ti.com, balbi@ti.com,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, jason@lakedaemon.net,
jiang.liu@linux.intel.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux@arm.linux.org.uk, marc.zyngier@arm.com, nsekhar@ti.com,
sudeep.holla@arm.com, tglx@linutronix.de, tony@atomide.com
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "genirq: Don't return ENOSYS in irq_chip_retrigger_hierarchy" has been added to the 4.1-stable tree
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 15:41:12 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1442011272159222@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
genirq: Don't return ENOSYS in irq_chip_retrigger_hierarchy
to the 4.1-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
genirq-don-t-return-enosys-in-irq_chip_retrigger_hierarchy.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.1 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From 6d4affea7d5aa5ca5ff4c3e5fbf3ee16801cc527 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2015 15:20:25 +0300
Subject: genirq: Don't return ENOSYS in irq_chip_retrigger_hierarchy
From: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
commit 6d4affea7d5aa5ca5ff4c3e5fbf3ee16801cc527 upstream.
irq_chip_retrigger_hierarchy() returns -ENOSYS if it was not able to
find at least one .irq_retrigger() callback implemented in the IRQ
domain hierarchy.
That's wrong, because check_irq_resend() expects a 0 return value from
the callback in case that the hardware assisted resend was not
possible. If the return value is non zero the core code assumes
hardware resend success and the software resend is not invoked.
This results in lost interrupts on platforms where none of the parent
irq chips in the hierarchy implements the retrigger callback.
This is observable on TI OMAP, where the hierarchy is:
ARM GIC <- OMAP wakeupgen <- TI Crossbar
Return 0 instead so the software resend mechanism gets invoked.
[ tglx: Massaged changelog ]
Fixes: 85f08c17de26 ('genirq: Introduce helper functions...')
Signed-off-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Cc: <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: <nsekhar@ti.com>
Cc: <jason@lakedaemon.net>
Cc: <balbi@ti.com>
Cc: <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Cc: <tony@atomide.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1439554830-19502-2-git-send-email-grygorii.strashko@ti.com
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
kernel/irq/chip.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/kernel/irq/chip.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/chip.c
@@ -946,7 +946,7 @@ int irq_chip_retrigger_hierarchy(struct
if (data->chip && data->chip->irq_retrigger)
return data->chip->irq_retrigger(data);
- return -ENOSYS;
+ return 0;
}
/**
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from grygorii.strashko@ti.com are
queue-4.1/irqchip-crossbar-restore-the-mask-on-suspend-behaviour.patch
queue-4.1/genirq-don-t-return-enosys-in-irq_chip_retrigger_hierarchy.patch
queue-4.1/irqchip-crossbar-restore-set_wake-functionality.patch
queue-4.1/irqchip-crossbar-restore-the-irq_set_type-mechanism.patch
queue-4.1/arm-dts-dra7-fix-broken-pbias-device-creation.patch
queue-4.1/genirq-introduce-irq_chip_set_type_parent-helper.patch
queue-4.1/arm-omap-wakeupgen-restore-the-irq_set_type-mechanism.patch
reply other threads:[~2015-09-11 22:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1442011272159222@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=balbi@ti.com \
--cc=grygorii.strashko@ti.com \
--cc=jason@lakedaemon.net \
--cc=jiang.liu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=nsekhar@ti.com \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).