Linux kernel -stable discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: labbott@fedoraproject.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
	mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com, oneukum@suse.com,
	stable@vger.kernel.org, tiwai@suse.de
Subject: patch "xhci: Add spurious wakeup quirk for LynxPoint-LP controllers" added to usb-linus
Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2015 00:04:42 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <144506548213743@kroah.com> (raw)


This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    xhci: Add spurious wakeup quirk for LynxPoint-LP controllers

to my usb git tree which can be found at
    git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/usb.git
in the usb-linus branch.

The patch will show up in the next release of the linux-next tree
(usually sometime within the next 24 hours during the week.)

The patch will hopefully also be merged in Linus's tree for the
next -rc kernel release.

If you have any questions about this process, please let me know.


>From fd7cd061adcf5f7503515ba52b6a724642a839c8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Laura Abbott <labbott@fedoraproject.org>
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 11:30:13 +0300
Subject: xhci: Add spurious wakeup quirk for LynxPoint-LP controllers

We received several reports of systems rebooting and powering on
after an attempted shutdown. Testing showed that setting
XHCI_SPURIOUS_WAKEUP quirk in addition to the XHCI_SPURIOUS_REBOOT
quirk allowed the system to shutdown as expected for LynxPoint-LP
xHCI controllers. Set the quirk back.

Note that the quirk was originally introduced for LynxPoint and
LynxPoint-LP just for this same reason. See:

commit 638298dc66ea ("xhci: Fix spurious wakeups after S5 on Haswell")

It was later limited to only concern HP machines as it caused
regression on some machines, see both bug and commit:

Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66171
commit 6962d914f317 ("xhci: Limit the spurious wakeup fix only to HP machines")

Later it was discovered that the powering on after shutdown
was limited to LynxPoint-LP (Haswell-ULT) and that some non-LP HP
machine suffered from spontaneous resume from S3 (which should
not be related to the SPURIOUS_WAKEUP quirk at all). An attempt
to fix this then removed the SPURIOUS_WAKEUP flag usage completely.

commit b45abacde3d5 ("xhci: no switching back on non-ULT Haswell")

Current understanding is that LynxPoint-LP (Haswell ULT) machines
need the SPURIOUS_WAKEUP quirk, otherwise they will restart, and
plain Lynxpoint (Haswell) machines may _not_ have the quirk
set otherwise they again will restart.

Signed-off-by: Laura Abbott <labbott@fedoraproject.org>
Cc: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Cc: Oliver Neukum <oneukum@suse.com>
[Added more history to commit message -Mathias]
Cc: stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 drivers/usb/host/xhci-pci.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-pci.c b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-pci.c
index c79d33676672..c47d3e480586 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-pci.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-pci.c
@@ -147,6 +147,7 @@ static void xhci_pci_quirks(struct device *dev, struct xhci_hcd *xhci)
 	if (pdev->vendor == PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL &&
 		pdev->device == PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_LYNXPOINT_LP_XHCI) {
 		xhci->quirks |= XHCI_SPURIOUS_REBOOT;
+		xhci->quirks |= XHCI_SPURIOUS_WAKEUP;
 	}
 	if (pdev->vendor == PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL &&
 		(pdev->device == PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_SUNRISEPOINT_LP_XHCI ||
-- 
2.6.1



                 reply	other threads:[~2015-10-17  7:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=144506548213743@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=labbott@fedoraproject.org \
    --cc=mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=oneukum@suse.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tiwai@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox