stable.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: fdmanana@suse.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "Btrfs: fix race when listing an inode's xattrs" has been added to the 4.3-stable tree
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2015 09:20:33 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1449854433129138@kroah.com> (raw)


This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    Btrfs: fix race when listing an inode's xattrs

to the 4.3-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     btrfs-fix-race-when-listing-an-inode-s-xattrs.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.3 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.


>From f1cd1f0b7d1b5d4aaa5711e8f4e4898b0045cb6d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2015 18:06:38 +0000
Subject: Btrfs: fix race when listing an inode's xattrs

From: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>

commit f1cd1f0b7d1b5d4aaa5711e8f4e4898b0045cb6d upstream.

When listing a inode's xattrs we have a time window where we race against
a concurrent operation for adding a new hard link for our inode that makes
us not return any xattr to user space. In order for this to happen, the
first xattr of our inode needs to be at slot 0 of a leaf and the previous
leaf must still have room for an inode ref (or extref) item, and this can
happen because an inode's listxattrs callback does not lock the inode's
i_mutex (nor does the VFS does it for us), but adding a hard link to an
inode makes the VFS lock the inode's i_mutex before calling the inode's
link callback.

If we have the following leafs:

               Leaf X (has N items)                    Leaf Y

 [ ... (257 INODE_ITEM 0) (257 INODE_REF 256) ]  [ (257 XATTR_ITEM 12345), ... ]
           slot N - 2         slot N - 1              slot 0

The race illustrated by the following sequence diagram is possible:

       CPU 1                                               CPU 2

  btrfs_listxattr()

    searches for key (257 XATTR_ITEM 0)

    gets path with path->nodes[0] == leaf X
    and path->slots[0] == N

    because path->slots[0] is >=
    btrfs_header_nritems(leaf X), it calls
    btrfs_next_leaf()

    btrfs_next_leaf()
      releases the path

                                                   adds key (257 INODE_REF 666)
                                                   to the end of leaf X (slot N),
                                                   and leaf X now has N + 1 items

      searches for the key (257 INODE_REF 256),
      with path->keep_locks == 1, because that
      is the last key it saw in leaf X before
      releasing the path

      ends up at leaf X again and it verifies
      that the key (257 INODE_REF 256) is no
      longer the last key in leaf X, so it
      returns with path->nodes[0] == leaf X
      and path->slots[0] == N, pointing to
      the new item with key (257 INODE_REF 666)

    btrfs_listxattr's loop iteration sees that
    the type of the key pointed by the path is
    different from the type BTRFS_XATTR_ITEM_KEY
    and so it breaks the loop and stops looking
    for more xattr items
      --> the application doesn't get any xattr
          listed for our inode

So fix this by breaking the loop only if the key's type is greater than
BTRFS_XATTR_ITEM_KEY and skip the current key if its type is smaller.

Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 fs/btrfs/xattr.c |    4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/fs/btrfs/xattr.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/xattr.c
@@ -313,8 +313,10 @@ ssize_t btrfs_listxattr(struct dentry *d
 		/* check to make sure this item is what we want */
 		if (found_key.objectid != key.objectid)
 			break;
-		if (found_key.type != BTRFS_XATTR_ITEM_KEY)
+		if (found_key.type > BTRFS_XATTR_ITEM_KEY)
 			break;
+		if (found_key.type < BTRFS_XATTR_ITEM_KEY)
+			goto next;
 
 		di = btrfs_item_ptr(leaf, slot, struct btrfs_dir_item);
 		if (verify_dir_item(root, leaf, di))


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from fdmanana@suse.com are

queue-4.3/btrfs-fix-file-corruption-and-data-loss-after-cloning-inline-extents.patch
queue-4.3/btrfs-fix-truncation-of-compressed-and-inlined-extents.patch
queue-4.3/btrfs-fix-regression-when-running-delayed-references.patch
queue-4.3/btrfs-fix-race-leading-to-bug_on-when-running-delalloc-for-nodatacow.patch
queue-4.3/btrfs-fix-race-leading-to-incorrect-item-deletion-when-dropping-extents.patch
queue-4.3/btrfs-fix-race-when-listing-an-inode-s-xattrs.patch
queue-4.3/btrfs-fix-resending-received-snapshot-with-parent.patch

                 reply	other threads:[~2015-12-11 20:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1449854433129138@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=fdmanana@suse.com \
    --cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).