From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: yu.c.chen@intel.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
lv.zheng@intel.com, rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "ACPI: Using correct irq when waiting for events" has been added to the 4.3-stable tree
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 14:43:27 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <145039220713055@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
ACPI: Using correct irq when waiting for events
to the 4.3-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
acpi-using-correct-irq-when-waiting-for-events.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.3 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From efb1cf7d28b8aeacec53e9ba8f3f2809c5cb9686 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2015 01:02:36 +0800
Subject: ACPI: Using correct irq when waiting for events
From: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
commit efb1cf7d28b8aeacec53e9ba8f3f2809c5cb9686 upstream.
When the system is waiting for GPE/fixed event handler to finish,
it uses acpi_gbl_FADT.sci_interrupt directly as the IRQ number.
However, the remapped IRQ returned by acpi_gsi_to_irq() should be
passed to synchronize_hardirq() instead of it.
Acked-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/acpi/osl.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/acpi/osl.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/osl.c
@@ -1183,8 +1183,8 @@ void acpi_os_wait_events_complete(void)
* Make sure the GPE handler or the fixed event handler is not used
* on another CPU after removal.
*/
- if (acpi_irq_handler)
- synchronize_hardirq(acpi_gbl_FADT.sci_interrupt);
+ if (acpi_sci_irq_valid())
+ synchronize_hardirq(acpi_sci_irq);
flush_workqueue(kacpid_wq);
flush_workqueue(kacpi_notify_wq);
}
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from yu.c.chen@intel.com are
queue-4.3/acpi-using-correct-irq-when-waiting-for-events.patch
queue-4.3/acpi-pm-fix-incorrect-wakeup-irq-setting-during-suspend-to-idle.patch
queue-4.3/acpi-use-correct-irq-when-uninstalling-acpi-interrupt-handler.patch
reply other threads:[~2015-12-17 22:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=145039220713055@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=lv.zheng@intel.com \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).