From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: tom.leiming@gmail.com, axboe@fb.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
keith.busch@intel.com, sth@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "block: fix bio splitting on max sectors" has been added to the 4.4-stable tree
Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2016 17:30:39 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <145437663971115@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
block: fix bio splitting on max sectors
to the 4.4-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
block-fix-bio-splitting-on-max-sectors.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.4 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From d0e5fbb01a67e400e82fefe4896ea40c6447ab98 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2016 08:05:33 +0800
Subject: block: fix bio splitting on max sectors
From: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com>
commit d0e5fbb01a67e400e82fefe4896ea40c6447ab98 upstream.
After commit e36f62042880(block: split bios to maxpossible length),
bio can be splitted in the middle of a vector entry, then it
is easy to split out one bio which size isn't aligned with block
size, especially when the block size is bigger than 512.
This patch fixes the issue by making the max io size aligned
to logical block size.
Fixes: e36f62042880(block: split bios to maxpossible length)
Reported-by: Stefan Haberland <sth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>
Suggested-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
block/blk-merge.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
--- a/block/blk-merge.c
+++ b/block/blk-merge.c
@@ -68,6 +68,18 @@ static struct bio *blk_bio_write_same_sp
return bio_split(bio, q->limits.max_write_same_sectors, GFP_NOIO, bs);
}
+static inline unsigned get_max_io_size(struct request_queue *q,
+ struct bio *bio)
+{
+ unsigned sectors = blk_max_size_offset(q, bio->bi_iter.bi_sector);
+ unsigned mask = queue_logical_block_size(q) - 1;
+
+ /* aligned to logical block size */
+ sectors &= ~(mask >> 9);
+
+ return sectors;
+}
+
static struct bio *blk_bio_segment_split(struct request_queue *q,
struct bio *bio,
struct bio_set *bs,
@@ -79,6 +91,7 @@ static struct bio *blk_bio_segment_split
unsigned front_seg_size = bio->bi_seg_front_size;
bool do_split = true;
struct bio *new = NULL;
+ const unsigned max_sectors = get_max_io_size(q, bio);
bio_for_each_segment(bv, bio, iter) {
/*
@@ -88,20 +101,19 @@ static struct bio *blk_bio_segment_split
if (bvprvp && bvec_gap_to_prev(q, bvprvp, bv.bv_offset))
goto split;
- if (sectors + (bv.bv_len >> 9) >
- blk_max_size_offset(q, bio->bi_iter.bi_sector)) {
+ if (sectors + (bv.bv_len >> 9) > max_sectors) {
/*
* Consider this a new segment if we're splitting in
* the middle of this vector.
*/
if (nsegs < queue_max_segments(q) &&
- sectors < blk_max_size_offset(q,
- bio->bi_iter.bi_sector)) {
+ sectors < max_sectors) {
nsegs++;
- sectors = blk_max_size_offset(q,
- bio->bi_iter.bi_sector);
+ sectors = max_sectors;
}
- goto split;
+ if (sectors)
+ goto split;
+ /* Make this single bvec as the 1st segment */
}
if (bvprvp && blk_queue_cluster(q)) {
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from tom.leiming@gmail.com are
queue-4.4/block-fix-bio-splitting-on-max-sectors.patch
queue-4.4/block-split-bios-to-max-possible-length.patch
reply other threads:[~2016-02-02 1:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=145437663971115@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=axboe@fb.com \
--cc=keith.busch@intel.com \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sth@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=tom.leiming@gmail.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).