Patch "tcp: beware of alignments in tcp_get_info()" has been added to the 4.4-stable tree

Patch "tcp: beware of alignments in tcp_get_info()" has been added to the 4.4-stable tree

[gregkh]

This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    tcp: beware of alignments in tcp_get_info()

to the 4.4-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     tcp-beware-of-alignments-in-tcp_get_info.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.4 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.


>From foo@baz Mon Feb 29 14:33:50 PST 2016
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 10:52:43 -0800
Subject: tcp: beware of alignments in tcp_get_info()

From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>

[ Upstream commit ff5d749772018602c47509bdc0093ff72acd82ec ]

With some combinations of user provided flags in netlink command,
it is possible to call tcp_get_info() with a buffer that is not 8-bytes
aligned.

It does matter on some arches, so we need to use put_unaligned() to
store the u64 fields.

Current iproute2 package does not trigger this particular issue.

Fixes: 0df48c26d841 ("tcp: add tcpi_bytes_acked to tcp_info")
Fixes: 977cb0ecf82e ("tcp: add pacing_rate information into tcp_info")
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 net/ipv4/tcp.c |   12 ++++++++----
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

--- a/net/ipv4/tcp.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp.c
@@ -279,6 +279,7 @@
 
 #include <asm/uaccess.h>
 #include <asm/ioctls.h>
+#include <asm/unaligned.h>
 #include <net/busy_poll.h>
 
 int sysctl_tcp_fin_timeout __read_mostly = TCP_FIN_TIMEOUT;
@@ -2637,6 +2638,7 @@ void tcp_get_info(struct sock *sk, struc
 	const struct inet_connection_sock *icsk = inet_csk(sk);
 	u32 now = tcp_time_stamp;
 	unsigned int start;
+	u64 rate64;
 	u32 rate;
 
 	memset(info, 0, sizeof(*info));
@@ -2702,15 +2704,17 @@ void tcp_get_info(struct sock *sk, struc
 	info->tcpi_total_retrans = tp->total_retrans;
 
 	rate = READ_ONCE(sk->sk_pacing_rate);
-	info->tcpi_pacing_rate = rate != ~0U ? rate : ~0ULL;
+	rate64 = rate != ~0U ? rate : ~0ULL;
+	put_unaligned(rate64, &info->tcpi_pacing_rate);
 
 	rate = READ_ONCE(sk->sk_max_pacing_rate);
-	info->tcpi_max_pacing_rate = rate != ~0U ? rate : ~0ULL;
+	rate64 = rate != ~0U ? rate : ~0ULL;
+	put_unaligned(rate64, &info->tcpi_max_pacing_rate);
 
 	do {
 		start = u64_stats_fetch_begin_irq(&tp->syncp);
-		info->tcpi_bytes_acked = tp->bytes_acked;
-		info->tcpi_bytes_received = tp->bytes_received;
+		put_unaligned(tp->bytes_acked, &info->tcpi_bytes_acked);
+		put_unaligned(tp->bytes_received, &info->tcpi_bytes_received);
 	} while (u64_stats_fetch_retry_irq(&tp->syncp, start));
 	info->tcpi_segs_out = tp->segs_out;
 	info->tcpi_segs_in = tp->segs_in;


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from edumazet@google.com are

queue-4.4/ipv4-fix-memory-leaks-in-ip_cmsg_send-callers.patch
queue-4.4/tcp-dccp-fix-another-race-at-listener-dismantle.patch
queue-4.4/ipv6-fix-a-lockdep-splat.patch
queue-4.4/ipv6-addrconf-fix-recursive-spin-lock-call.patch
queue-4.4/tcp-do-not-drop-syn_recv-on-all-icmp-reports.patch
queue-4.4/tcp-beware-of-alignments-in-tcp_get_info.patch
queue-4.4/tcp-md5-release-request-socket-instead-of-listener.patch
queue-4.4/gro-make-gro-aware-of-lightweight-tunnels.patch
queue-4.4/tcp-fix-null-deref-in-tcp_v4_send_ack.patch
queue-4.4/af_unix-fix-struct-pid-memory-leak.patch
queue-4.4/net-add-sysctl_max_skb_frags.patch