From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: johannes.berg@intel.com, bgalvani@redhat.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "wext: fix message delay/ordering" has been added to the 3.10-stable tree
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2016 23:04:01 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <145776624123916@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
wext: fix message delay/ordering
to the 3.10-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
wext-fix-message-delay-ordering.patch
and it can be found in the queue-3.10 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From 8bf862739a7786ae72409220914df960a0aa80d8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 12:37:52 +0100
Subject: wext: fix message delay/ordering
From: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
commit 8bf862739a7786ae72409220914df960a0aa80d8 upstream.
Beniamino reported that he was getting an RTM_NEWLINK message for a
given interface, after the RTM_DELLINK for it. It turns out that the
message is a wireless extensions message, which was sent because the
interface had been connected and disconnection while it was deleted
caused a wext message.
For its netlink messages, wext uses RTM_NEWLINK, but the message is
without all the regular rtnetlink attributes, so "ip monitor link"
prints just rudimentary information:
5: wlan1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 qdisc mq state DOWN group default
link/ether 02:00:00:00:01:00 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
Deleted 5: wlan1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 qdisc noop state DOWN group default
link/ether 02:00:00:00:01:00 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
5: wlan1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP>
link/ether
(from my hwsim reproduction)
This can cause userspace to get confused since it doesn't expect an
RTM_NEWLINK message after RTM_DELLINK.
The reason for this is that wext schedules a worker to send out the
messages, and the scheduling delay can cause the messages to get out
to userspace in different order.
To fix this, have wext register a netdevice notifier and flush out
any pending messages when netdevice state changes. This fixes any
ordering whenever the original message wasn't sent by a notifier
itself.
Reported-by: Beniamino Galvani <bgalvani@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
net/wireless/wext-core.c | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
--- a/net/wireless/wext-core.c
+++ b/net/wireless/wext-core.c
@@ -342,6 +342,39 @@ static const int compat_event_type_size[
/* IW event code */
+static void wireless_nlevent_flush(void)
+{
+ struct sk_buff *skb;
+ struct net *net;
+
+ ASSERT_RTNL();
+
+ for_each_net(net) {
+ while ((skb = skb_dequeue(&net->wext_nlevents)))
+ rtnl_notify(skb, net, 0, RTNLGRP_LINK, NULL,
+ GFP_KERNEL);
+ }
+}
+
+static int wext_netdev_notifier_call(struct notifier_block *nb,
+ unsigned long state, void *ptr)
+{
+ /*
+ * When a netdev changes state in any way, flush all pending messages
+ * to avoid them going out in a strange order, e.g. RTM_NEWLINK after
+ * RTM_DELLINK, or with IFF_UP after without IFF_UP during dev_close()
+ * or similar - all of which could otherwise happen due to delays from
+ * schedule_work().
+ */
+ wireless_nlevent_flush();
+
+ return NOTIFY_OK;
+}
+
+static struct notifier_block wext_netdev_notifier = {
+ .notifier_call = wext_netdev_notifier_call,
+};
+
static int __net_init wext_pernet_init(struct net *net)
{
skb_queue_head_init(&net->wext_nlevents);
@@ -360,7 +393,12 @@ static struct pernet_operations wext_per
static int __init wireless_nlevent_init(void)
{
- return register_pernet_subsys(&wext_pernet_ops);
+ int err = register_pernet_subsys(&wext_pernet_ops);
+
+ if (err)
+ return err;
+
+ return register_netdevice_notifier(&wext_netdev_notifier);
}
subsys_initcall(wireless_nlevent_init);
@@ -368,17 +406,8 @@ subsys_initcall(wireless_nlevent_init);
/* Process events generated by the wireless layer or the driver. */
static void wireless_nlevent_process(struct work_struct *work)
{
- struct sk_buff *skb;
- struct net *net;
-
rtnl_lock();
-
- for_each_net(net) {
- while ((skb = skb_dequeue(&net->wext_nlevents)))
- rtnl_notify(skb, net, 0, RTNLGRP_LINK, NULL,
- GFP_KERNEL);
- }
-
+ wireless_nlevent_flush();
rtnl_unlock();
}
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from johannes.berg@intel.com are
queue-3.10/mac80211-minstrel_ht-set-default-tx-aggregation-timeout-to-0.patch
queue-3.10/wext-fix-message-delay-ordering.patch
queue-3.10/mac80211-fix-use-of-uninitialised-values-in-rx-aggregation.patch
reply other threads:[~2016-03-12 7:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=145776624123916@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=bgalvani@redhat.com \
--cc=johannes.berg@intel.com \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).