From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: bp@suse.de, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, mingo@kernel.org,
peterz@infradead.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, tv@lio96.de
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "x86/microcode/intel: Make early loader look for builtin microcode too" has been added to the 4.4-stable tree
Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2016 11:30:34 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <146022663413157@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
x86/microcode/intel: Make early loader look for builtin microcode too
to the 4.4-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
x86-microcode-intel-make-early-loader-look-for-builtin-microcode-too.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.4 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From 264285ac01673e70557c43ecee338ce97c4c0672 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2016 12:33:30 +0100
Subject: x86/microcode/intel: Make early loader look for builtin microcode too
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
commit 264285ac01673e70557c43ecee338ce97c4c0672 upstream.
Set the initrd @start depending on the presence of an initrd. Otherwise,
builtin microcode loading doesn't work as the start is wrong and we're
using it to compute offset to the microcode blobs.
Tested-by: Thomas Voegtle <tv@lio96.de>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1454499225-21544-3-git-send-email-bp@alien8.de
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
@@ -555,10 +555,14 @@ scan_microcode(struct mc_saved_data *mc_
cd.data = NULL;
cd.size = 0;
- cd = find_cpio_data(p, (void *)start, size, &offset);
- if (!cd.data) {
+ /* try built-in microcode if no initrd */
+ if (!size) {
if (!load_builtin_intel_microcode(&cd))
return UCODE_ERROR;
+ } else {
+ cd = find_cpio_data(p, (void *)start, size, &offset);
+ if (!cd.data)
+ return UCODE_ERROR;
}
return get_matching_model_microcode(0, start, cd.data, cd.size,
@@ -732,16 +736,20 @@ void __init load_ucode_intel_bsp(void)
struct boot_params *p;
p = (struct boot_params *)__pa_nodebug(&boot_params);
- start = p->hdr.ramdisk_image;
size = p->hdr.ramdisk_size;
- _load_ucode_intel_bsp(
- (struct mc_saved_data *)__pa_nodebug(&mc_saved_data),
- (unsigned long *)__pa_nodebug(&mc_saved_in_initrd),
- start, size);
+ /*
+ * Set start only if we have an initrd image. We cannot use initrd_start
+ * because it is not set that early yet.
+ */
+ start = (size ? p->hdr.ramdisk_image : 0);
+
+ _load_ucode_intel_bsp((struct mc_saved_data *)__pa_nodebug(&mc_saved_data),
+ (unsigned long *)__pa_nodebug(&mc_saved_in_initrd),
+ start, size);
#else
- start = boot_params.hdr.ramdisk_image + PAGE_OFFSET;
size = boot_params.hdr.ramdisk_size;
+ start = (size ? boot_params.hdr.ramdisk_image + PAGE_OFFSET : 0);
_load_ucode_intel_bsp(&mc_saved_data, mc_saved_in_initrd, start, size);
#endif
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from bp@suse.de are
queue-4.4/x86-microcode-intel-make-early-loader-look-for-builtin-microcode-too.patch
queue-4.4/edac-amd64_edac-shift-wrapping-issue-in-f1x_get_norm_dct_addr.patch
queue-4.4/x86-microcode-untangle-from-blk_dev_initrd.patch
reply other threads:[~2016-04-09 18:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=146022663413157@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=bp@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=tv@lio96.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox