From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: cbf123@mail.usask.ca, chris.friesen@windriver.com,
fweisbec@gmail.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, mingo@kernel.org,
peterz@infradead.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "sched/cputime: Fix steal_account_process_tick() to always return jiffies" has been added to the 4.5-stable tree
Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2016 11:33:08 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1460226788255209@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
sched/cputime: Fix steal_account_process_tick() to always return jiffies
to the 4.5-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
sched-cputime-fix-steal_account_process_tick-to-always-return-jiffies.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.5 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From f9c904b7613b8b4c85b10cd6b33ad41b2843fa9d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chris Friesen <cbf123@mail.usask.ca>
Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2016 23:18:48 -0600
Subject: sched/cputime: Fix steal_account_process_tick() to always return jiffies
From: Chris Friesen <cbf123@mail.usask.ca>
commit f9c904b7613b8b4c85b10cd6b33ad41b2843fa9d upstream.
The callers of steal_account_process_tick() expect it to return
whether a jiffy should be considered stolen or not.
Currently the return value of steal_account_process_tick() is in
units of cputime, which vary between either jiffies or nsecs
depending on CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING_GEN.
If cputime has nsecs granularity and there is a tiny amount of
stolen time (a few nsecs, say) then we will consider the entire
tick stolen and will not account the tick on user/system/idle,
causing /proc/stats to show invalid data.
The fix is to change steal_account_process_tick() to accumulate
the stolen time and only account it once it's worth a jiffy.
(Thanks to Frederic Weisbecker for suggestions to fix a bug in my
first version of the patch.)
Signed-off-by: Chris Friesen <chris.friesen@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/56DBBDB8.40305@mail.usask.ca
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
kernel/sched/cputime.c | 14 +++++++-------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
--- a/kernel/sched/cputime.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/cputime.c
@@ -262,21 +262,21 @@ static __always_inline bool steal_accoun
#ifdef CONFIG_PARAVIRT
if (static_key_false(¶virt_steal_enabled)) {
u64 steal;
- cputime_t steal_ct;
+ unsigned long steal_jiffies;
steal = paravirt_steal_clock(smp_processor_id());
steal -= this_rq()->prev_steal_time;
/*
- * cputime_t may be less precise than nsecs (eg: if it's
- * based on jiffies). Lets cast the result to cputime
+ * steal is in nsecs but our caller is expecting steal
+ * time in jiffies. Lets cast the result to jiffies
* granularity and account the rest on the next rounds.
*/
- steal_ct = nsecs_to_cputime(steal);
- this_rq()->prev_steal_time += cputime_to_nsecs(steal_ct);
+ steal_jiffies = nsecs_to_jiffies(steal);
+ this_rq()->prev_steal_time += jiffies_to_nsecs(steal_jiffies);
- account_steal_time(steal_ct);
- return steal_ct;
+ account_steal_time(jiffies_to_cputime(steal_jiffies));
+ return steal_jiffies;
}
#endif
return false;
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from cbf123@mail.usask.ca are
queue-4.5/sched-cputime-fix-steal_account_process_tick-to-always-return-jiffies.patch
reply other threads:[~2016-04-09 18:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1460226788255209@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=cbf123@mail.usask.ca \
--cc=chris.friesen@windriver.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox