From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: kys@microsoft.com, arseneyr@microsoft.com, decui@microsoft.com,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: patch "Drivers: hv: vmbus: Fix signaling logic in" added to char-misc-linus
Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2016 14:06:06 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1462050366209106@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
Drivers: hv: vmbus: Fix signaling logic in
to my char-misc git tree which can be found at
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/char-misc.git
in the char-misc-linus branch.
The patch will show up in the next release of the linux-next tree
(usually sometime within the next 24 hours during the week.)
The patch will hopefully also be merged in Linus's tree for the
next -rc kernel release.
If you have any questions about this process, please let me know.
>From 1db488d12894f1936360779d6ab2aede3dd7f06a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@microsoft.com>
Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2016 16:17:38 -0700
Subject: Drivers: hv: vmbus: Fix signaling logic in
hv_need_to_signal_on_read()
On the consumer side, we have interrupt driven flow management of the
producer. It is sufficient to base the signaling decision on the
amount of space that is available to write after the read is complete.
The current code samples the previous available space and uses this
in making the signaling decision. This state can be stale and is
unnecessary. Since the state can be stale, we end up not signaling
the host (when we should) and this can result in a hang. Fix this
problem by removing the unnecessary check. I would like to thank
Arseney Romanenko <arseneyr@microsoft.com> for pointing out this issue.
Also, issue a full memory barrier before making the signaling descision
to correctly deal with potential reordering of the write (read index)
followed by the read of pending_sz.
Signed-off-by: K. Y. Srinivasan <kys@microsoft.com>
Tested-by: Dexuan Cui <decui@microsoft.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/hv/ring_buffer.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/hv/ring_buffer.c b/drivers/hv/ring_buffer.c
index 5613e2b5cff7..a40a73a7b71d 100644
--- a/drivers/hv/ring_buffer.c
+++ b/drivers/hv/ring_buffer.c
@@ -103,15 +103,29 @@ static bool hv_need_to_signal(u32 old_write, struct hv_ring_buffer_info *rbi)
* there is room for the producer to send the pending packet.
*/
-static bool hv_need_to_signal_on_read(u32 prev_write_sz,
- struct hv_ring_buffer_info *rbi)
+static bool hv_need_to_signal_on_read(struct hv_ring_buffer_info *rbi)
{
u32 cur_write_sz;
u32 r_size;
- u32 write_loc = rbi->ring_buffer->write_index;
+ u32 write_loc;
u32 read_loc = rbi->ring_buffer->read_index;
- u32 pending_sz = rbi->ring_buffer->pending_send_sz;
+ u32 pending_sz;
+ /*
+ * Issue a full memory barrier before making the signaling decision.
+ * Here is the reason for having this barrier:
+ * If the reading of the pend_sz (in this function)
+ * were to be reordered and read before we commit the new read
+ * index (in the calling function) we could
+ * have a problem. If the host were to set the pending_sz after we
+ * have sampled pending_sz and go to sleep before we commit the
+ * read index, we could miss sending the interrupt. Issue a full
+ * memory barrier to address this.
+ */
+ mb();
+
+ pending_sz = rbi->ring_buffer->pending_send_sz;
+ write_loc = rbi->ring_buffer->write_index;
/* If the other end is not blocked on write don't bother. */
if (pending_sz == 0)
return false;
@@ -120,7 +134,7 @@ static bool hv_need_to_signal_on_read(u32 prev_write_sz,
cur_write_sz = write_loc >= read_loc ? r_size - (write_loc - read_loc) :
read_loc - write_loc;
- if ((prev_write_sz < pending_sz) && (cur_write_sz >= pending_sz))
+ if (cur_write_sz >= pending_sz)
return true;
return false;
@@ -455,7 +469,7 @@ int hv_ringbuffer_read(struct hv_ring_buffer_info *inring_info,
/* Update the read index */
hv_set_next_read_location(inring_info, next_read_location);
- *signal = hv_need_to_signal_on_read(bytes_avail_towrite, inring_info);
+ *signal = hv_need_to_signal_on_read(inring_info);
return ret;
}
--
2.8.0
reply other threads:[~2016-04-30 21:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1462050366209106@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=arseneyr@microsoft.com \
--cc=decui@microsoft.com \
--cc=kys@microsoft.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).