From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: anton@samba.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] powerpc: scan_features() updates incorrect bits for REAL_LE" failed to apply to 3.14-stable tree
Date: Sun, 01 May 2016 15:42:28 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1462142548154146@kroah.com> (raw)
The patch below does not apply to the 3.14-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
>From 6997e57d693b07289694239e52a10d2f02c3a46f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2016 12:06:13 +1000
Subject: [PATCH] powerpc: scan_features() updates incorrect bits for REAL_LE
The REAL_LE feature entry in the ibm_pa_feature struct is missing an MMU
feature value, meaning all the remaining elements initialise the wrong
values.
This means instead of checking for byte 5, bit 0, we check for byte 0,
bit 0, and then we incorrectly set the CPU feature bit as well as MMU
feature bit 1 and CPU user feature bits 0 and 2 (5).
Checking byte 0 bit 0 (IBM numbering), means we're looking at the
"Memory Management Unit (MMU)" feature - ie. does the CPU have an MMU.
In practice that bit is set on all platforms which have the property.
This means we set CPU_FTR_REAL_LE always. In practice that seems not to
matter because all the modern cpus which have this property also
implement REAL_LE, and we've never needed to disable it.
We're also incorrectly setting MMU feature bit 1, which is:
#define MMU_FTR_TYPE_8xx 0x00000002
Luckily the only place that looks for MMU_FTR_TYPE_8xx is in Book3E
code, which can't run on the same cpus as scan_features(). So this also
doesn't matter in practice.
Finally in the CPU user feature mask, we're setting bits 0 and 2. Bit 2
is not currently used, and bit 0 is:
#define PPC_FEATURE_PPC_LE 0x00000001
Which says the CPU supports the old style "PPC Little Endian" mode.
Again this should be harmless in practice as no 64-bit CPUs implement
that mode.
Fix the code by adding the missing initialisation of the MMU feature.
Also add a comment marking CPU user feature bit 2 (0x4) as reserved. It
would be unsafe to start using it as old kernels incorrectly set it.
Fixes: 44ae3ab3358e ("powerpc: Free up some CPU feature bits by moving out MMU-related features")
Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
[mpe: Flesh out changelog, add comment reserving 0x4]
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/cputable.h b/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/cputable.h
index 8dde19962a5b..f63c96cd3608 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/cputable.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/cputable.h
@@ -31,6 +31,7 @@
#define PPC_FEATURE_PSERIES_PERFMON_COMPAT \
0x00000040
+/* Reserved - do not use 0x00000004 */
#define PPC_FEATURE_TRUE_LE 0x00000002
#define PPC_FEATURE_PPC_LE 0x00000001
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c
index 7030b035905d..080c96b44a7f 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c
@@ -158,7 +158,7 @@ static struct ibm_pa_feature {
{CPU_FTR_NOEXECUTE, 0, 0, 0, 6, 0},
{CPU_FTR_NODSISRALIGN, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1},
{0, MMU_FTR_CI_LARGE_PAGE, 0, 1, 2, 0},
- {CPU_FTR_REAL_LE, PPC_FEATURE_TRUE_LE, 5, 0, 0},
+ {CPU_FTR_REAL_LE, 0, PPC_FEATURE_TRUE_LE, 5, 0, 0},
/*
* If the kernel doesn't support TM (ie. CONFIG_PPC_TRANSACTIONAL_MEM=n),
* we don't want to turn on CPU_FTR_TM here, so we use CPU_FTR_TM_COMP
next reply other threads:[~2016-05-01 22:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-01 22:42 gregkh [this message]
2016-05-09 1:00 ` [Backport v3.14 PATCH] powerpc: scan_features() updates incorrect bits for REAL_LE Michael Ellerman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1462142548154146@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=anton@samba.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).