public inbox for stable@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
To: stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 09/17] Btrfs: fix race when checking if we can skip fsync'ing an inode
Date: Thu,  5 May 2016 11:44:05 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1462441445-2899-1-git-send-email-dsterba@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160505094018.GA29353@twin.jikos.cz>

From: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>

If we're about to do a fast fsync for an inode and btrfs_inode_in_log()
returns false, it's possible that we had an ordered extent in progress
(btrfs_finish_ordered_io() not run yet) when we noticed that the inode's
last_trans field was not greater than the id of the last committed
transaction, but shortly after, before we checked if there were any
ongoing ordered extents, the ordered extent had just completed and
removed itself from the inode's ordered tree, in which case we end up not
logging the inode, losing some data if a power failure or crash happens
after the fsync handler returns and before the transaction is committed.

Fix this by checking first if there are any ongoing ordered extents
before comparing the inode's last_trans with the id of the last committed
transaction - when it completes, an ordered extent always updates the
inode's last_trans before it removes itself from the inode's ordered
tree (at btrfs_finish_ordered_io()).

Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
---
 fs/btrfs/file.c | 9 +++++----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/file.c b/fs/btrfs/file.c
index 9a30ca64066b..5d956b869e03 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/file.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/file.c
@@ -1996,10 +1996,11 @@ int btrfs_sync_file(struct file *file, loff_t start, loff_t end, int datasync)
 	 */
 	smp_mb();
 	if (btrfs_inode_in_log(inode, root->fs_info->generation) ||
-	    (BTRFS_I(inode)->last_trans <=
-	     root->fs_info->last_trans_committed &&
-	     (full_sync ||
-	      !btrfs_have_ordered_extents_in_range(inode, start, len)))) {
+	    (full_sync && BTRFS_I(inode)->last_trans <=
+	     root->fs_info->last_trans_committed) ||
+	    (!btrfs_have_ordered_extents_in_range(inode, start, len) &&
+	     BTRFS_I(inode)->last_trans
+	     <= root->fs_info->last_trans_committed)) {
 		/*
 		 * We'v had everything committed since the last time we were
 		 * modified so clear this flag in case it was set for whatever
-- 
2.7.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-05-05  9:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-05-05  9:40 Btrfs stable fixes for 4.5.x David Sterba
2016-05-05  9:43 ` [PATCH 01/17] btrfs: reada: Fix in-segment calculation for reada David Sterba
2016-05-05 12:37   ` Greg KH
2016-05-05  9:43 ` [PATCH 02/17] Btrfs: fix truncate_space_check David Sterba
2016-05-05  9:43 ` [PATCH 03/17] btrfs: remove error message from search ioctl for nonexistent tree David Sterba
2016-05-05  9:43 ` [PATCH 04/17] btrfs: change max_inline default to 2048 David Sterba
2016-05-05  9:43 ` [PATCH 05/17] Btrfs: fix unreplayable log after snapshot delete + parent dir fsync David Sterba
2016-05-05  9:43 ` [PATCH 06/17] Btrfs: fix file loss on log replay after renaming a file and fsync David Sterba
2016-05-05  9:43 ` [PATCH 07/17] Btrfs: fix extent_same allowing destination offset beyond i_size David Sterba
2016-05-05  9:44 ` [PATCH 08/17] Btrfs: fix deadlock between direct IO reads and buffered writes David Sterba
2016-05-05  9:44 ` David Sterba [this message]
2016-05-05  9:44 ` [PATCH 10/17] Btrfs: do not collect ordered extents when logging that inode exists David Sterba
2016-05-05  9:44 ` [PATCH 11/17] btrfs: csum_tree_block: return proper errno value David Sterba
2016-05-05  9:44 ` [PATCH 12/17] btrfs: do not write corrupted metadata blocks to disk David Sterba
2016-05-05  9:44 ` [PATCH 13/17] Btrfs: fix invalid reference in replace_path David Sterba
2016-05-05  9:44 ` [PATCH 14/17] btrfs: handle non-fatal errors in btrfs_qgroup_inherit() David Sterba
2016-05-05  9:44 ` [PATCH 15/17] btrfs: fallback to vmalloc in btrfs_compare_tree David Sterba
2016-05-05  9:44 ` [PATCH 16/17] Btrfs: don't use src fd for printk David Sterba
2016-05-05  9:44 ` [PATCH 17/17] btrfs: Reset IO error counters before start of device replacing David Sterba
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-05-11 12:45 Btrfs stable fixes for 4.5.x (with added commit references) David Sterba
2016-05-11 12:47 ` [PATCH 09/17] Btrfs: fix race when checking if we can skip fsync'ing an inode David Sterba

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1462441445-2899-1-git-send-email-dsterba@suse.com \
    --to=dsterba@suse.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox