From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: rostedt@goodmis.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "ring-buffer: Prevent overflow of size in ring_buffer_resize()" has been added to the 4.6-stable tree
Date: Sun, 29 May 2016 14:52:26 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1464558746244109@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
ring-buffer: Prevent overflow of size in ring_buffer_resize()
to the 4.6-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
ring-buffer-prevent-overflow-of-size-in-ring_buffer_resize.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.6 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From 59643d1535eb220668692a5359de22545af579f6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Steven Rostedt (Red Hat)" <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 09:34:12 -0400
Subject: ring-buffer: Prevent overflow of size in ring_buffer_resize()
From: Steven Rostedt (Red Hat) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
commit 59643d1535eb220668692a5359de22545af579f6 upstream.
If the size passed to ring_buffer_resize() is greater than MAX_LONG - BUF_PAGE_SIZE
then the DIV_ROUND_UP() will return zero.
Here's the details:
# echo 18014398509481980 > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/buffer_size_kb
tracing_entries_write() processes this and converts kb to bytes.
18014398509481980 << 10 = 18446744073709547520
and this is passed to ring_buffer_resize() as unsigned long size.
size = DIV_ROUND_UP(size, BUF_PAGE_SIZE);
Where DIV_ROUND_UP(a, b) is (a + b - 1)/b
BUF_PAGE_SIZE is 4080 and here
18446744073709547520 + 4080 - 1 = 18446744073709551599
where 18446744073709551599 is still smaller than 2^64
2^64 - 18446744073709551599 = 17
But now 18446744073709551599 / 4080 = 4521260802379792
and size = size * 4080 = 18446744073709551360
This is checked to make sure its still greater than 2 * 4080,
which it is.
Then we convert to the number of buffer pages needed.
nr_page = DIV_ROUND_UP(size, BUF_PAGE_SIZE)
but this time size is 18446744073709551360 and
2^64 - (18446744073709551360 + 4080 - 1) = -3823
Thus it overflows and the resulting number is less than 4080, which makes
3823 / 4080 = 0
an nr_pages is set to this. As we already checked against the minimum that
nr_pages may be, this causes the logic to fail as well, and we crash the
kernel.
There's no reason to have the two DIV_ROUND_UP() (that's just result of
historical code changes), clean up the code and fix this bug.
Fixes: 83f40318dab00 ("ring-buffer: Make removal of ring buffer pages atomic")
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c | 9 ++++-----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
--- a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
@@ -1657,14 +1657,13 @@ int ring_buffer_resize(struct ring_buffe
!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu_id, buffer->cpumask))
return size;
- size = DIV_ROUND_UP(size, BUF_PAGE_SIZE);
- size *= BUF_PAGE_SIZE;
+ nr_pages = DIV_ROUND_UP(size, BUF_PAGE_SIZE);
/* we need a minimum of two pages */
- if (size < BUF_PAGE_SIZE * 2)
- size = BUF_PAGE_SIZE * 2;
+ if (nr_pages < 2)
+ nr_pages = 2;
- nr_pages = DIV_ROUND_UP(size, BUF_PAGE_SIZE);
+ size = nr_pages * BUF_PAGE_SIZE;
/*
* Don't succeed if resizing is disabled, as a reader might be
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from rostedt@goodmis.org are
queue-4.6/ring-buffer-prevent-overflow-of-size-in-ring_buffer_resize.patch
queue-4.6/ring-buffer-use-long-for-nr_pages-to-avoid-overflow-failures.patch
reply other threads:[~2016-05-29 21:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1464558746244109@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox