From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: adrian.hunter@intel.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
ulf.hansson@linaro.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "mmc: sdhci-acpi: Remove MMC_CAP_BUS_WIDTH_TEST for Intel controllers" has been added to the 4.6-stable tree
Date: Sun, 29 May 2016 15:21:14 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <146456047480173@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
mmc: sdhci-acpi: Remove MMC_CAP_BUS_WIDTH_TEST for Intel controllers
to the 4.6-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
mmc-sdhci-acpi-remove-mmc_cap_bus_width_test-for-intel-controllers.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.6 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From 265984b36ce82fec67957d452dd2b22e010611e4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 20 May 2016 10:33:48 +0300
Subject: mmc: sdhci-acpi: Remove MMC_CAP_BUS_WIDTH_TEST for Intel controllers
From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
commit 265984b36ce82fec67957d452dd2b22e010611e4 upstream.
The CMD19/CMD14 bus width test has been found to be unreliable in
some cases. It is not essential, so simply remove it.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-acpi.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-acpi.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-acpi.c
@@ -277,7 +277,7 @@ static const struct sdhci_acpi_slot sdhc
.chip = &sdhci_acpi_chip_int,
.caps = MMC_CAP_8_BIT_DATA | MMC_CAP_NONREMOVABLE |
MMC_CAP_HW_RESET | MMC_CAP_1_8V_DDR |
- MMC_CAP_BUS_WIDTH_TEST | MMC_CAP_WAIT_WHILE_BUSY,
+ MMC_CAP_WAIT_WHILE_BUSY,
.caps2 = MMC_CAP2_HC_ERASE_SZ,
.flags = SDHCI_ACPI_RUNTIME_PM,
.quirks = SDHCI_QUIRK_NO_ENDATTR_IN_NOPDESC,
@@ -292,7 +292,7 @@ static const struct sdhci_acpi_slot sdhc
SDHCI_QUIRK_NO_ENDATTR_IN_NOPDESC,
.quirks2 = SDHCI_QUIRK2_HOST_OFF_CARD_ON,
.caps = MMC_CAP_NONREMOVABLE | MMC_CAP_POWER_OFF_CARD |
- MMC_CAP_BUS_WIDTH_TEST | MMC_CAP_WAIT_WHILE_BUSY,
+ MMC_CAP_WAIT_WHILE_BUSY,
.flags = SDHCI_ACPI_RUNTIME_PM,
.pm_caps = MMC_PM_KEEP_POWER,
.probe_slot = sdhci_acpi_sdio_probe_slot,
@@ -304,7 +304,7 @@ static const struct sdhci_acpi_slot sdhc
.quirks = SDHCI_QUIRK_NO_ENDATTR_IN_NOPDESC,
.quirks2 = SDHCI_QUIRK2_CARD_ON_NEEDS_BUS_ON |
SDHCI_QUIRK2_STOP_WITH_TC,
- .caps = MMC_CAP_BUS_WIDTH_TEST | MMC_CAP_WAIT_WHILE_BUSY,
+ .caps = MMC_CAP_WAIT_WHILE_BUSY,
.probe_slot = sdhci_acpi_sd_probe_slot,
};
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from adrian.hunter@intel.com are
queue-4.6/mmc-sdhci-acpi-ensure-connected-devices-are-powered-when-probing.patch
queue-4.6/mmc-mmc-fix-partition-switch-timeout-for-some-emmcs.patch
queue-4.6/mmc-longer-timeout-for-long-read-time-quirk.patch
queue-4.6/mmc-sdhci-acpi-remove-mmc_cap_bus_width_test-for-intel-controllers.patch
queue-4.6/mmc-sdhci-pci-remove-mmc_cap_bus_width_test-for-intel-controllers.patch
reply other threads:[~2016-05-29 22:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=146456047480173@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox