From: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
To: stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 03/21] btrfs: allow balancing to dup with multi-device
Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2016 17:42:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1464968532-6301-1-git-send-email-dsterba@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160603154006.GP29147@suse.cz>
From: "Austin S. Hemmelgarn" <ahferroin7@gmail.com>
commit 88be159c905a2b4f6d59afa352bef410afb6af02 upstream.
Currently, we don't allow the user to try and rebalance to a dup profile
on a multi-device filesystem. In most cases, this is a perfectly sensible
restriction as raid1 uses the same amount of space and provides better
protection.
However, when reshaping a multi-device filesystem down to a single device
filesystem, this requires the user to convert metadata and system chunks
to single profile before deleting devices, and then convert again to dup,
which leaves a period of time where metadata integrity is reduced.
This patch removes the single-device-only restriction from converting to
dup profile to remove this potential data integrity reduction.
Signed-off-by: Austin S. Hemmelgarn <ahferroin7@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
---
fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 6 ++----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
index adb5f697a963..89c2aabaea2d 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
@@ -3699,10 +3699,8 @@ int btrfs_balance(struct btrfs_balance_control *bctl,
num_devices--;
}
btrfs_dev_replace_unlock(&fs_info->dev_replace);
- allowed = BTRFS_AVAIL_ALLOC_BIT_SINGLE;
- if (num_devices == 1)
- allowed |= BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DUP;
- else if (num_devices > 1)
+ allowed = BTRFS_AVAIL_ALLOC_BIT_SINGLE | BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DUP;
+ if (num_devices > 1)
allowed |= (BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID0 | BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID1);
if (num_devices > 2)
allowed |= BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID5;
--
2.7.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-03 15:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-03 15:40 Btrfs stable patches for 4.5.x David Sterba
2016-06-03 15:42 ` [PATCH 01/21] btrfs: bugfix: handle FS_IOC32_{GETFLAGS,SETFLAGS,GETVERSION} in btrfs_ioctl David Sterba
2016-06-03 15:42 ` [PATCH 02/21] Btrfs: do not create empty block group if we have allocated data David Sterba
2016-06-03 15:42 ` David Sterba [this message]
2016-06-03 15:42 ` [PATCH 04/21] btrfs: fix mixed block count of available space David Sterba
2016-06-03 15:42 ` [PATCH 05/21] btrfs: avoid overflowing f_bfree David Sterba
2016-06-03 15:42 ` [PATCH 06/21] btrfs: fix lock dep warning, move scratch dev out of device_list_mutex and uuid_mutex David Sterba
2016-06-03 15:42 ` [PATCH 07/21] btrfs: add read-only check to sysfs handler of features David Sterba
2016-06-03 15:42 ` [PATCH 08/21] btrfs: add check to sysfs handler of label David Sterba
2016-06-03 15:42 ` [PATCH 09/21] Btrfs: fix divide error upon chunk's stripe_len David Sterba
2016-06-03 15:42 ` [PATCH 10/21] Btrfs: remove BUG_ON()'s in btrfs_map_block David Sterba
2016-06-03 15:42 ` [PATCH 11/21] btrfs: fix lock dep warning move scratch super outside of chunk_mutex David Sterba
2016-06-03 15:42 ` [PATCH 12/21] btrfs: add write protection to SET_FEATURES ioctl David Sterba
2016-06-03 15:42 ` [PATCH 13/21] btrfs: fix int32 overflow in shrink_delalloc() David Sterba
2016-06-03 15:42 ` [PATCH 14/21] Btrfs: fix fspath error deallocation David Sterba
2016-06-03 15:42 ` [PATCH 15/21] btrfs: fix memory leak during RAID 5/6 device replacement David Sterba
2016-06-03 15:42 ` [PATCH 16/21] btrfs: pass the right error code to the btrfs_std_error David Sterba
2016-06-03 15:42 ` [PATCH 17/21] Btrfs: fix for incorrect directory entries after fsync log replay David Sterba
2016-06-03 15:42 ` [PATCH 18/21] Btrfs: fix empty symlink after creating symlink and fsync parent dir David Sterba
2016-06-03 15:42 ` [PATCH 19/21] Btrfs: fix unexpected return value of fiemap David Sterba
2016-06-03 15:42 ` [PATCH 20/21] btrfs: scrub: Set bbio to NULL before calling btrfs_map_block David Sterba
2016-06-03 15:42 ` [PATCH 21/21] btrfs: make state preallocation more speculative in __set_extent_bit David Sterba
2016-06-05 21:48 ` Btrfs stable patches for 4.5.x Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1464968532-6301-1-git-send-email-dsterba@suse.com \
--to=dsterba@suse.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox