* Patch "netfilter: x_tables: don't move to non-existent next rule" has been added to the 4.6-stable tree
@ 2016-06-22 21:19 gregkh
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: gregkh @ 2016-06-22 21:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: fw, gregkh, hawkes, pablo; +Cc: stable, stable-commits
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
netfilter: x_tables: don't move to non-existent next rule
to the 4.6-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
netfilter-x_tables-don-t-move-to-non-existent-next-rule.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.6 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From f24e230d257af1ad7476c6e81a8dc3127a74204e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2016 14:17:21 +0200
Subject: netfilter: x_tables: don't move to non-existent next rule
From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
commit f24e230d257af1ad7476c6e81a8dc3127a74204e upstream.
Ben Hawkes says:
In the mark_source_chains function (net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.c) it
is possible for a user-supplied ipt_entry structure to have a large
next_offset field. This field is not bounds checked prior to writing a
counter value at the supplied offset.
Base chains enforce absolute verdict.
User defined chains are supposed to end with an unconditional return,
xtables userspace adds them automatically.
But if such return is missing we will move to non-existent next rule.
Reported-by: Ben Hawkes <hawkes@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
net/ipv4/netfilter/arp_tables.c | 8 +++++---
net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.c | 4 ++++
net/ipv6/netfilter/ip6_tables.c | 4 ++++
3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--- a/net/ipv4/netfilter/arp_tables.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/netfilter/arp_tables.c
@@ -439,6 +439,8 @@ static int mark_source_chains(const stru
size = e->next_offset;
e = (struct arpt_entry *)
(entry0 + pos + size);
+ if (pos + size >= newinfo->size)
+ return 0;
e->counters.pcnt = pos;
pos += size;
} else {
@@ -461,6 +463,8 @@ static int mark_source_chains(const stru
} else {
/* ... this is a fallthru */
newpos = pos + e->next_offset;
+ if (newpos >= newinfo->size)
+ return 0;
}
e = (struct arpt_entry *)
(entry0 + newpos);
@@ -691,10 +695,8 @@ static int translate_table(struct xt_tab
}
}
- if (!mark_source_chains(newinfo, repl->valid_hooks, entry0)) {
- duprintf("Looping hook\n");
+ if (!mark_source_chains(newinfo, repl->valid_hooks, entry0))
return -ELOOP;
- }
/* Finally, each sanity check must pass */
i = 0;
--- a/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.c
@@ -520,6 +520,8 @@ mark_source_chains(const struct xt_table
size = e->next_offset;
e = (struct ipt_entry *)
(entry0 + pos + size);
+ if (pos + size >= newinfo->size)
+ return 0;
e->counters.pcnt = pos;
pos += size;
} else {
@@ -541,6 +543,8 @@ mark_source_chains(const struct xt_table
} else {
/* ... this is a fallthru */
newpos = pos + e->next_offset;
+ if (newpos >= newinfo->size)
+ return 0;
}
e = (struct ipt_entry *)
(entry0 + newpos);
--- a/net/ipv6/netfilter/ip6_tables.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/netfilter/ip6_tables.c
@@ -532,6 +532,8 @@ mark_source_chains(const struct xt_table
size = e->next_offset;
e = (struct ip6t_entry *)
(entry0 + pos + size);
+ if (pos + size >= newinfo->size)
+ return 0;
e->counters.pcnt = pos;
pos += size;
} else {
@@ -553,6 +555,8 @@ mark_source_chains(const struct xt_table
} else {
/* ... this is a fallthru */
newpos = pos + e->next_offset;
+ if (newpos >= newinfo->size)
+ return 0;
}
e = (struct ip6t_entry *)
(entry0 + newpos);
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from fw@strlen.de are
queue-4.6/netfilter-x_tables-add-and-use-xt_check_entry_offsets.patch
queue-4.6/netfilter-x_tables-assert-minimum-target-size.patch
queue-4.6/netfilter-x_tables-add-compat-version-of-xt_check_entry_offsets.patch
queue-4.6/netfilter-x_tables-check-for-bogus-target-offset.patch
queue-4.6/netfilter-x_tables-validate-targets-of-jumps.patch
queue-4.6/netfilter-x_tables-don-t-move-to-non-existent-next-rule.patch
queue-4.6/netfilter-x_tables-kill-check_entry-helper.patch
queue-4.6/netfilter-x_tables-check-standard-target-size-too.patch
queue-4.6/netfilter-x_tables-validate-all-offsets-and-sizes-in-a-rule.patch
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2016-06-22 21:19 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-06-22 21:19 Patch "netfilter: x_tables: don't move to non-existent next rule" has been added to the 4.6-stable tree gregkh
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).