From: Oliver Neukum <oneukum@suse.com>
To: "Bjørn Mork" <bjorn@mork.no>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] cdc-wdm: fix "out-of-sync" due to missing notifications
Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2016 14:52:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1467723170.1909.11.camel@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87shvpcp7w.fsf@nemi.mork.no>
On Mon, 2016-07-04 at 19:01 +0200, Bjørn Mork wrote:
> The proposed driver solution is a hack, allowing us to resyncronize
> without resetting the firmware. We have no reliable way to reset the
> firmware and doing so will have large side effects anyway. The hack
> allows us to continue, with a possibly lost message or two as the only
> consequences. We don't have to break any existing session etc.
OK, then I propose it is time to bring out the sledge hammer.
How about changing usb_cdc_wdm_register() to include a flag
about the necessity to drain the buffers?
> But it turns out that it is a real problem for the very same MBIM
> firmwares which caused us to need the hack in the first place: They
> stall when you try to read and there is no data. Which means that a
> lost race can end up with an EPIPE being returned to _read(), where it
> is translated and returned to userspace.
This sucks and it tells me even more that CDC MBIM should tell us when
to apply this work around at startup.
> This is a mess. I fully agree that it looks like this either should go
> into both open() and resume(), or none. The real answer is 'none'.
>
> But we need the hack for the yucky MBIM firmwares. Putting it in open()
> is defining open() as a syncronization point for something which should
> not need syncronization in a perfect world. I can expand the comment
> there a bit to make this clear. Making resume() a syncronization point
> as well is only making things worse.
I'd say add a flag, let CDC MBIM set it unconditionally (we can switch
to a black list if we absolutely need to) and include a big, fat
commentary. There is no good solution for this problem.
Regards
Oliver
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-05 12:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-03 19:59 [PATCH v2] cdc-wdm: fix "out-of-sync" due to missing notifications Bjørn Mork
2016-07-04 8:04 ` Oliver Neukum
2016-07-04 11:54 ` Bjørn Mork
2016-07-04 12:48 ` Oliver Neukum
2016-07-04 13:09 ` Bjørn Mork
2016-07-04 17:01 ` Bjørn Mork
2016-07-05 12:52 ` Oliver Neukum [this message]
2016-07-09 18:31 ` Bjørn Mork
2016-07-10 12:47 ` Oliver Neukum
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1467723170.1909.11.camel@suse.com \
--to=oneukum@suse.com \
--cc=bjorn@mork.no \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox