From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: gpiccoli@linux.vnet.ibm.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com, mpe@ellerman.id.au
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "powerpc/iommu: Remove the dependency on EEH struct in DDW mechanism" has been added to the 4.6-stable tree
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2016 15:48:25 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1468277305199232@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
powerpc/iommu: Remove the dependency on EEH struct in DDW mechanism
to the 4.6-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
powerpc-iommu-remove-the-dependency-on-eeh-struct-in-ddw-mechanism.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.6 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From 8445a87f7092bc8336ea1305be9306f26b846d93 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Guilherme G. Piccoli" <gpiccoli@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2016 16:17:23 -0300
Subject: powerpc/iommu: Remove the dependency on EEH struct in DDW mechanism
From: Guilherme G. Piccoli <gpiccoli@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
commit 8445a87f7092bc8336ea1305be9306f26b846d93 upstream.
Commit 39baadbf36ce ("powerpc/eeh: Remove eeh information from pci_dn")
changed the pci_dn struct by removing its EEH-related members.
As part of this clean-up, DDW mechanism was modified to read the device
configuration address from eeh_dev struct.
As a consequence, now if we disable EEH mechanism on kernel command-line
for example, the DDW mechanism will fail, generating a kernel oops by
dereferencing a NULL pointer (which turns to be the eeh_dev pointer).
This patch just changes the configuration address calculation on DDW
functions to a manual calculation based on pci_dn members instead of
using eeh_dev-based address.
No functional changes were made. This was tested on pSeries, both
in PHyp and qemu guest.
Fixes: 39baadbf36ce ("powerpc/eeh: Remove eeh information from pci_dn")
Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Guilherme G. Piccoli <gpiccoli@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/iommu.c | 24 ++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/iommu.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/iommu.c
@@ -912,7 +912,8 @@ machine_arch_initcall(pseries, find_exis
static int query_ddw(struct pci_dev *dev, const u32 *ddw_avail,
struct ddw_query_response *query)
{
- struct eeh_dev *edev;
+ struct device_node *dn;
+ struct pci_dn *pdn;
u32 cfg_addr;
u64 buid;
int ret;
@@ -923,11 +924,10 @@ static int query_ddw(struct pci_dev *dev
* Retrieve them from the pci device, not the node with the
* dma-window property
*/
- edev = pci_dev_to_eeh_dev(dev);
- cfg_addr = edev->config_addr;
- if (edev->pe_config_addr)
- cfg_addr = edev->pe_config_addr;
- buid = edev->phb->buid;
+ dn = pci_device_to_OF_node(dev);
+ pdn = PCI_DN(dn);
+ buid = pdn->phb->buid;
+ cfg_addr = (pdn->busno << 8) | pdn->devfn;
ret = rtas_call(ddw_avail[0], 3, 5, (u32 *)query,
cfg_addr, BUID_HI(buid), BUID_LO(buid));
@@ -941,7 +941,8 @@ static int create_ddw(struct pci_dev *de
struct ddw_create_response *create, int page_shift,
int window_shift)
{
- struct eeh_dev *edev;
+ struct device_node *dn;
+ struct pci_dn *pdn;
u32 cfg_addr;
u64 buid;
int ret;
@@ -952,11 +953,10 @@ static int create_ddw(struct pci_dev *de
* Retrieve them from the pci device, not the node with the
* dma-window property
*/
- edev = pci_dev_to_eeh_dev(dev);
- cfg_addr = edev->config_addr;
- if (edev->pe_config_addr)
- cfg_addr = edev->pe_config_addr;
- buid = edev->phb->buid;
+ dn = pci_device_to_OF_node(dev);
+ pdn = PCI_DN(dn);
+ buid = pdn->phb->buid;
+ cfg_addr = (pdn->busno << 8) | pdn->devfn;
do {
/* extra outputs are LIOBN and dma-addr (hi, lo) */
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from gpiccoli@linux.vnet.ibm.com are
queue-4.6/powerpc-iommu-remove-the-dependency-on-eeh-struct-in-ddw-mechanism.patch
queue-4.6/powerpc-pseries-fix-pci-config-address-for-ddw.patch
reply other threads:[~2016-07-11 23:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1468277305199232@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=gpiccoli@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).