Linux kernel -stable discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: bfields@redhat.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, trondmy@primarydata.com
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "rpc: share one xps between all backchannels" has been added to the 4.6-stable tree
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2016 16:39:11 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1468280351252185@kroah.com> (raw)


This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    rpc: share one xps between all backchannels

to the 4.6-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     rpc-share-one-xps-between-all-backchannels.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.6 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.


>From 39a9beab5acb83176e8b9a4f0778749a09341f1f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 17 May 2016 12:38:21 -0400
Subject: rpc: share one xps between all backchannels

From: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>

commit 39a9beab5acb83176e8b9a4f0778749a09341f1f upstream.

The spec allows backchannels for multiple clients to share the same tcp
connection.  When that happens, we need to use the same xprt for all of
them.  Similarly, we need the same xps.

This fixes list corruption introduced by the multipath code.

Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Trond Myklebust <trondmy@primarydata.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 include/linux/sunrpc/svc_xprt.h |    1 +
 include/linux/sunrpc/xprt.h     |    1 +
 net/sunrpc/clnt.c               |   18 ++++++++++++++----
 net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c           |    2 ++
 net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c           |    1 +
 5 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

--- a/include/linux/sunrpc/svc_xprt.h
+++ b/include/linux/sunrpc/svc_xprt.h
@@ -84,6 +84,7 @@ struct svc_xprt {
 
 	struct net		*xpt_net;
 	struct rpc_xprt		*xpt_bc_xprt;	/* NFSv4.1 backchannel */
+	struct rpc_xprt_switch	*xpt_bc_xps;	/* NFSv4.1 backchannel */
 };
 
 static inline void unregister_xpt_user(struct svc_xprt *xpt, struct svc_xpt_user *u)
--- a/include/linux/sunrpc/xprt.h
+++ b/include/linux/sunrpc/xprt.h
@@ -296,6 +296,7 @@ struct xprt_create {
 	size_t			addrlen;
 	const char		*servername;
 	struct svc_xprt		*bc_xprt;	/* NFSv4.1 backchannel */
+	struct rpc_xprt_switch	*bc_xps;
 	unsigned int		flags;
 };
 
--- a/net/sunrpc/clnt.c
+++ b/net/sunrpc/clnt.c
@@ -452,10 +452,20 @@ static struct rpc_clnt *rpc_create_xprt(
 	struct rpc_clnt *clnt = NULL;
 	struct rpc_xprt_switch *xps;
 
-	xps = xprt_switch_alloc(xprt, GFP_KERNEL);
-	if (xps == NULL) {
-		xprt_put(xprt);
-		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
+	if (args->bc_xprt && args->bc_xprt->xpt_bc_xps) {
+		WARN_ON(args->protocol != XPRT_TRANSPORT_BC_TCP);
+		xps = args->bc_xprt->xpt_bc_xps;
+		xprt_switch_get(xps);
+	} else {
+		xps = xprt_switch_alloc(xprt, GFP_KERNEL);
+		if (xps == NULL) {
+			xprt_put(xprt);
+			return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
+		}
+		if (xprt->bc_xprt) {
+			xprt_switch_get(xps);
+			xprt->bc_xprt->xpt_bc_xps = xps;
+		}
 	}
 	clnt = rpc_new_client(args, xps, xprt, NULL);
 	if (IS_ERR(clnt))
--- a/net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c
+++ b/net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c
@@ -136,6 +136,8 @@ static void svc_xprt_free(struct kref *k
 	/* See comment on corresponding get in xs_setup_bc_tcp(): */
 	if (xprt->xpt_bc_xprt)
 		xprt_put(xprt->xpt_bc_xprt);
+	if (xprt->xpt_bc_xps)
+		xprt_switch_put(xprt->xpt_bc_xps);
 	xprt->xpt_ops->xpo_free(xprt);
 	module_put(owner);
 }
--- a/net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c
+++ b/net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c
@@ -3050,6 +3050,7 @@ static struct rpc_xprt *xs_setup_bc_tcp(
 		return xprt;
 
 	args->bc_xprt->xpt_bc_xprt = NULL;
+	args->bc_xprt->xpt_bc_xps = NULL;
 	xprt_put(xprt);
 	ret = ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
 out_err:


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from bfields@redhat.com are

queue-4.6/nfsd-check-permissions-when-setting-acls.patch
queue-4.6/nfsd-always-lock-state-exclusively.patch
queue-4.6/rpc-share-one-xps-between-all-backchannels.patch
queue-4.6/nfsd-extend-the-mutex-holding-region-around-in-nfsd4_process_open2.patch
queue-4.6/nfsd4-rpc-move-backchannel-create-logic-into-rpc-code.patch
queue-4.6/sunrpc-fix-xprt-leak-on-xps-allocation-failure.patch

                 reply	other threads:[~2016-07-12  2:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1468280351252185@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=bfields@redhat.com \
    --cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=trondmy@primarydata.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox