From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: viresh.kumar@linaro.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
mgautam@codeaurora.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
stern@rowland.harvard.edu
Subject: patch "usb: hub: Fix unbalanced reference count/memory leak/deadlocks" added to usb-linus
Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2016 15:46:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1470750401148188@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
usb: hub: Fix unbalanced reference count/memory leak/deadlocks
to my usb git tree which can be found at
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/usb.git
in the usb-linus branch.
The patch will show up in the next release of the linux-next tree
(usually sometime within the next 24 hours during the week.)
The patch will hopefully also be merged in Linus's tree for the
next -rc kernel release.
If you have any questions about this process, please let me know.
>From 6bb47e8ab98accb1319bd43c64966340ba3bba9a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2016 13:32:22 -0700
Subject: usb: hub: Fix unbalanced reference count/memory leak/deadlocks
Memory leak and unbalanced reference count:
If the hub gets disconnected while the core is still activating it, this
can result in leaking memory of few USB structures.
This will happen if we have done a kref_get() from hub_activate() and
scheduled a delayed work item for HUB_INIT2/3. Now if hub_disconnect()
gets called before the delayed work expires, then we will cancel the
work from hub_quiesce(), but wouldn't do a kref_put(). And so the
unbalance.
kmemleak reports this as (with the commit e50293ef9775 backported to
3.10 kernel with other changes, though the same is true for mainline as
well):
unreferenced object 0xffffffc08af5b800 (size 1024):
comm "khubd", pid 73, jiffies 4295051211 (age 6482.350s)
hex dump (first 32 bytes):
30 68 f3 8c c0 ff ff ff 00 a0 b2 2e c0 ff ff ff 0h..............
01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 94 7d 40 c0 ff ff ff ..........}@....
backtrace:
[<ffffffc0003079ec>] create_object+0x148/0x2a0
[<ffffffc000cc150c>] kmemleak_alloc+0x80/0xbc
[<ffffffc000303a7c>] kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x120/0x1ac
[<ffffffc0006fa610>] hub_probe+0x120/0xb84
[<ffffffc000702b20>] usb_probe_interface+0x1ec/0x298
[<ffffffc0005d50cc>] driver_probe_device+0x160/0x374
[<ffffffc0005d5308>] __device_attach+0x28/0x4c
[<ffffffc0005d3164>] bus_for_each_drv+0x78/0xac
[<ffffffc0005d4ee0>] device_attach+0x6c/0x9c
[<ffffffc0005d42b8>] bus_probe_device+0x28/0xa0
[<ffffffc0005d23a4>] device_add+0x324/0x604
[<ffffffc000700fcc>] usb_set_configuration+0x660/0x6cc
[<ffffffc00070a350>] generic_probe+0x44/0x84
[<ffffffc000702914>] usb_probe_device+0x54/0x74
[<ffffffc0005d50cc>] driver_probe_device+0x160/0x374
[<ffffffc0005d5308>] __device_attach+0x28/0x4c
Deadlocks:
If the hub gets disconnected early enough (i.e. before INIT2/INIT3 are
finished and the init_work is still queued), the core may call
hub_quiesce() after acquiring interface device locks and it will wait
for the work to be cancelled synchronously. But if the work handler is
already running in parallel, it may try to acquire the same interface
device lock and this may result in deadlock.
Fix both the issues by removing the call to cancel_delayed_work_sync().
CC: <stable@vger.kernel.org> #4.4+
Fixes: e50293ef9775 ("USB: fix invalid memory access in hub_activate()")
Reported-by: Manu Gautam <mgautam@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/usb/core/hub.c | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/usb/core/hub.c b/drivers/usb/core/hub.c
index bee13517676f..3ccffac0f647 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/core/hub.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/core/hub.c
@@ -1315,8 +1315,6 @@ static void hub_quiesce(struct usb_hub *hub, enum hub_quiescing_type type)
struct usb_device *hdev = hub->hdev;
int i;
- cancel_delayed_work_sync(&hub->init_work);
-
/* hub_wq and related activity won't re-trigger */
hub->quiescing = 1;
--
2.9.2
reply other threads:[~2016-08-09 13:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1470750401148188@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=mgautam@codeaurora.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox