Linux kernel -stable discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: ebiederm@xmission.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, tj@kernel.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "cgroupns: Fix the locking in copy_cgroup_ns" has been added to the 4.7-stable tree
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2016 12:57:35 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <147151785524086@kroah.com> (raw)


This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    cgroupns: Fix the locking in copy_cgroup_ns

to the 4.7-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     cgroupns-fix-the-locking-in-copy_cgroup_ns.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.7 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.


>From 7bd8830875bfa380c68f390efbad893293749324 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2016 06:35:24 -0500
Subject: cgroupns: Fix the locking in copy_cgroup_ns

From: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>

commit 7bd8830875bfa380c68f390efbad893293749324 upstream.

If "clone(CLONE_NEWCGROUP...)" is called it results in a nice lockdep
valid splat.

In __cgroup_proc_write the lock ordering is:
     cgroup_mutex -- through cgroup_kn_lock_live
     cgroup_threadgroup_rwsem

In copy_process the guts of clone the lock ordering is:
     cgroup_threadgroup_rwsem -- through threadgroup_change_begin
     cgroup_mutex -- through copy_namespaces -- copy_cgroup_ns

lockdep reports some a different call chains for the first ordering of
cgroup_mutex and cgroup_threadgroup_rwsem but it is harder to trace.
This is most definitely deadlock potential under the right
circumstances.

Fix this by by skipping the cgroup_mutex and making the locking in
copy_cgroup_ns mirror the locking in cgroup_post_fork which also runs
during fork under the cgroup_threadgroup_rwsem.

Fixes: a79a908fd2b0 ("cgroup: introduce cgroup namespaces")
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 kernel/cgroup.c |    5 +----
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)

--- a/kernel/cgroup.c
+++ b/kernel/cgroup.c
@@ -6309,14 +6309,11 @@ struct cgroup_namespace *copy_cgroup_ns(
 	if (!ns_capable(user_ns, CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
 		return ERR_PTR(-EPERM);
 
-	mutex_lock(&cgroup_mutex);
+	/* It is not safe to take cgroup_mutex here */
 	spin_lock_irq(&css_set_lock);
-
 	cset = task_css_set(current);
 	get_css_set(cset);
-
 	spin_unlock_irq(&css_set_lock);
-	mutex_unlock(&cgroup_mutex);
 
 	new_ns = alloc_cgroup_ns();
 	if (IS_ERR(new_ns)) {


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from ebiederm@xmission.com are

queue-4.7/cgroupns-fix-the-locking-in-copy_cgroup_ns.patch
queue-4.7/cgroupns-only-allow-creation-of-hierarchies-in-the-initial-cgroup-namespace.patch
queue-4.7/cgroupns-close-race-between-cgroup_post_fork-and-copy_cgroup_ns.patch

                 reply	other threads:[~2016-08-18 10:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=147151785524086@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox