From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: chenhc@lemote.com, Steven.Hill@imgtec.com,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, john@phrozen.org,
ralf@linux-mips.org, wuzhangjin@gmail.com, zhangfx@lemote.com
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "MIPS: hpet: Increase HPET_MIN_PROG_DELTA and decrease HPET_MIN_CYCLES" has been added to the 4.4-stable tree
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2016 15:13:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <14715260121436@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
MIPS: hpet: Increase HPET_MIN_PROG_DELTA and decrease HPET_MIN_CYCLES
to the 4.4-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
mips-hpet-increase-hpet_min_prog_delta-and-decrease-hpet_min_cycles.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.4 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From 3ef06653987d4c4536b408321edf0e5caa2a317f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Huacai Chen <chenhc@lemote.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 14:27:51 +0800
Subject: MIPS: hpet: Increase HPET_MIN_PROG_DELTA and decrease HPET_MIN_CYCLES
From: Huacai Chen <chenhc@lemote.com>
commit 3ef06653987d4c4536b408321edf0e5caa2a317f upstream.
At first, we prefer to use mips clockevent device, so we decrease the
rating of hpet clockevent device.
For hpet, if HPET_MIN_PROG_DELTA (minimum delta of hpet programming) is
too small and HPET_MIN_CYCLES (threshold of -ETIME checking) is too
large, then hpet_next_event() can easily return -ETIME. After commit
c6eb3f70d44828 ("hrtimer: Get rid of hrtimer softirq") this will cause
a RCU stall.
So, HPET_MIN_PROG_DELTA must be sufficient that we don't re-trip the
-ETIME check -- if we do, we will return -ETIME, forward the next event
time, try to set it, return -ETIME again, and basically lock the system
up. Meanwhile, HPET_MIN_CYCLES doesn't need to be too large, 16 cycles
is enough.
This solution is similar to commit f9eccf24615672 ("clocksource/drivers
/vt8500: Increase the minimum delta").
By the way, this patch ensures hpet count/compare to be 32-bit long.
Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <chenhc@lemote.com>
Cc: John Crispin <john@phrozen.org>
Cc: Steven J . Hill <Steven.Hill@imgtec.com>
Cc: Fuxin Zhang <zhangfx@lemote.com>
Cc: Zhangjin Wu <wuzhangjin@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/13819/
Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
arch/mips/loongson64/loongson-3/hpet.c | 14 +++++++-------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/mips/loongson64/loongson-3/hpet.c
+++ b/arch/mips/loongson64/loongson-3/hpet.c
@@ -13,8 +13,8 @@
#define SMBUS_PCI_REG64 0x64
#define SMBUS_PCI_REGB4 0xb4
-#define HPET_MIN_CYCLES 64
-#define HPET_MIN_PROG_DELTA (HPET_MIN_CYCLES + (HPET_MIN_CYCLES >> 1))
+#define HPET_MIN_CYCLES 16
+#define HPET_MIN_PROG_DELTA (HPET_MIN_CYCLES * 12)
static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(hpet_lock);
DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct clock_event_device, hpet_clockevent_device);
@@ -157,14 +157,14 @@ static int hpet_tick_resume(struct clock
static int hpet_next_event(unsigned long delta,
struct clock_event_device *evt)
{
- unsigned int cnt;
- int res;
+ u32 cnt;
+ s32 res;
cnt = hpet_read(HPET_COUNTER);
- cnt += delta;
+ cnt += (u32) delta;
hpet_write(HPET_T0_CMP, cnt);
- res = (int)(cnt - hpet_read(HPET_COUNTER));
+ res = (s32)(cnt - hpet_read(HPET_COUNTER));
return res < HPET_MIN_CYCLES ? -ETIME : 0;
}
@@ -230,7 +230,7 @@ void __init setup_hpet_timer(void)
cd = &per_cpu(hpet_clockevent_device, cpu);
cd->name = "hpet";
- cd->rating = 320;
+ cd->rating = 100;
cd->features = CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_PERIODIC | CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_ONESHOT;
cd->set_state_shutdown = hpet_set_state_shutdown;
cd->set_state_periodic = hpet_set_state_periodic;
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from chenhc@lemote.com are
queue-4.4/mips-hpet-increase-hpet_min_prog_delta-and-decrease-hpet_min_cycles.patch
queue-4.4/mips-don-t-register-r4k-sched-clock-when-cpufreq-enabled.patch
reply other threads:[~2016-08-18 13:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=14715260121436@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=Steven.Hill@imgtec.com \
--cc=chenhc@lemote.com \
--cc=john@phrozen.org \
--cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wuzhangjin@gmail.com \
--cc=zhangfx@lemote.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox