Linux kernel -stable discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: chenhc@lemote.com, Steven.Hill@imgtec.com,
	gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, john@phrozen.org,
	ralf@linux-mips.org, wuzhangjin@gmail.com, zhangfx@lemote.com
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "MIPS: hpet: Increase HPET_MIN_PROG_DELTA and decrease HPET_MIN_CYCLES" has been added to the 4.4-stable tree
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2016 15:13:32 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <14715260121436@kroah.com> (raw)


This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    MIPS: hpet: Increase HPET_MIN_PROG_DELTA and decrease HPET_MIN_CYCLES

to the 4.4-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     mips-hpet-increase-hpet_min_prog_delta-and-decrease-hpet_min_cycles.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.4 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.


>From 3ef06653987d4c4536b408321edf0e5caa2a317f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Huacai Chen <chenhc@lemote.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 14:27:51 +0800
Subject: MIPS: hpet: Increase HPET_MIN_PROG_DELTA and decrease HPET_MIN_CYCLES

From: Huacai Chen <chenhc@lemote.com>

commit 3ef06653987d4c4536b408321edf0e5caa2a317f upstream.

At first, we prefer to use mips clockevent device, so we decrease the
rating of hpet clockevent device.

For hpet, if HPET_MIN_PROG_DELTA (minimum delta of hpet programming) is
too small and HPET_MIN_CYCLES (threshold of -ETIME checking) is too
large, then hpet_next_event() can easily return -ETIME. After commit
c6eb3f70d44828 ("hrtimer: Get rid of hrtimer softirq") this will cause
a RCU stall.

So, HPET_MIN_PROG_DELTA must be sufficient that we don't re-trip the
-ETIME check -- if we do, we will return -ETIME, forward the next event
time, try to set it, return -ETIME again, and basically lock the system
up. Meanwhile, HPET_MIN_CYCLES doesn't need to be too large, 16 cycles
is enough.

This solution is similar to commit f9eccf24615672 ("clocksource/drivers
/vt8500: Increase the minimum delta").

By the way, this patch ensures hpet count/compare to be 32-bit long.

Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <chenhc@lemote.com>
Cc: John Crispin <john@phrozen.org>
Cc: Steven J . Hill <Steven.Hill@imgtec.com>
Cc: Fuxin Zhang <zhangfx@lemote.com>
Cc: Zhangjin Wu <wuzhangjin@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/13819/
Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 arch/mips/loongson64/loongson-3/hpet.c |   14 +++++++-------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/mips/loongson64/loongson-3/hpet.c
+++ b/arch/mips/loongson64/loongson-3/hpet.c
@@ -13,8 +13,8 @@
 #define SMBUS_PCI_REG64		0x64
 #define SMBUS_PCI_REGB4		0xb4
 
-#define HPET_MIN_CYCLES		64
-#define HPET_MIN_PROG_DELTA	(HPET_MIN_CYCLES + (HPET_MIN_CYCLES >> 1))
+#define HPET_MIN_CYCLES		16
+#define HPET_MIN_PROG_DELTA	(HPET_MIN_CYCLES * 12)
 
 static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(hpet_lock);
 DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct clock_event_device, hpet_clockevent_device);
@@ -157,14 +157,14 @@ static int hpet_tick_resume(struct clock
 static int hpet_next_event(unsigned long delta,
 		struct clock_event_device *evt)
 {
-	unsigned int cnt;
-	int res;
+	u32 cnt;
+	s32 res;
 
 	cnt = hpet_read(HPET_COUNTER);
-	cnt += delta;
+	cnt += (u32) delta;
 	hpet_write(HPET_T0_CMP, cnt);
 
-	res = (int)(cnt - hpet_read(HPET_COUNTER));
+	res = (s32)(cnt - hpet_read(HPET_COUNTER));
 
 	return res < HPET_MIN_CYCLES ? -ETIME : 0;
 }
@@ -230,7 +230,7 @@ void __init setup_hpet_timer(void)
 
 	cd = &per_cpu(hpet_clockevent_device, cpu);
 	cd->name = "hpet";
-	cd->rating = 320;
+	cd->rating = 100;
 	cd->features = CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_PERIODIC | CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_ONESHOT;
 	cd->set_state_shutdown = hpet_set_state_shutdown;
 	cd->set_state_periodic = hpet_set_state_periodic;


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from chenhc@lemote.com are

queue-4.4/mips-hpet-increase-hpet_min_prog_delta-and-decrease-hpet_min_cycles.patch
queue-4.4/mips-don-t-register-r4k-sched-clock-when-cpufreq-enabled.patch

                 reply	other threads:[~2016-08-18 13:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=14715260121436@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=Steven.Hill@imgtec.com \
    --cc=chenhc@lemote.com \
    --cc=john@phrozen.org \
    --cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=wuzhangjin@gmail.com \
    --cc=zhangfx@lemote.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox