From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: trond.myklebust@primarydata.com, bfields@redhat.com,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "SUNRPC: Don't allocate a full sockaddr_storage for tracing" has been added to the 4.4-stable tree
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2016 15:13:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1471526019239158@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
SUNRPC: Don't allocate a full sockaddr_storage for tracing
to the 4.4-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
sunrpc-don-t-allocate-a-full-sockaddr_storage-for-tracing.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.4 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From db1bb44c4c7e8d49ed674dc59e5222d99c698088 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2016 10:55:44 -0400
Subject: SUNRPC: Don't allocate a full sockaddr_storage for tracing
From: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
commit db1bb44c4c7e8d49ed674dc59e5222d99c698088 upstream.
We're always tracing IPv4 or IPv6 addresses, so we can save a lot
of space on the ringbuffer by allocating the correct sockaddr size.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Fixes: 83a712e0afef "sunrpc: add some tracepoints around ..."
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
include/trace/events/sunrpc.h | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
--- a/include/trace/events/sunrpc.h
+++ b/include/trace/events/sunrpc.h
@@ -529,20 +529,27 @@ TRACE_EVENT(svc_xprt_do_enqueue,
TP_STRUCT__entry(
__field(struct svc_xprt *, xprt)
- __field_struct(struct sockaddr_storage, ss)
__field(int, pid)
__field(unsigned long, flags)
+ __dynamic_array(unsigned char, addr, xprt != NULL ?
+ xprt->xpt_remotelen : 0)
),
TP_fast_assign(
__entry->xprt = xprt;
- xprt ? memcpy(&__entry->ss, &xprt->xpt_remote, sizeof(__entry->ss)) : memset(&__entry->ss, 0, sizeof(__entry->ss));
__entry->pid = rqst? rqst->rq_task->pid : 0;
- __entry->flags = xprt ? xprt->xpt_flags : 0;
+ if (xprt) {
+ memcpy(__get_dynamic_array(addr),
+ &xprt->xpt_remote,
+ xprt->xpt_remotelen);
+ __entry->flags = xprt->xpt_flags;
+ } else
+ __entry->flags = 0;
),
TP_printk("xprt=0x%p addr=%pIScp pid=%d flags=%s", __entry->xprt,
- (struct sockaddr *)&__entry->ss,
+ __get_dynamic_array_len(addr) != 0 ?
+ (struct sockaddr *)__get_dynamic_array(addr) : NULL,
__entry->pid, show_svc_xprt_flags(__entry->flags))
);
@@ -553,18 +560,25 @@ TRACE_EVENT(svc_xprt_dequeue,
TP_STRUCT__entry(
__field(struct svc_xprt *, xprt)
- __field_struct(struct sockaddr_storage, ss)
__field(unsigned long, flags)
+ __dynamic_array(unsigned char, addr, xprt != NULL ?
+ xprt->xpt_remotelen : 0)
),
TP_fast_assign(
- __entry->xprt = xprt,
- xprt ? memcpy(&__entry->ss, &xprt->xpt_remote, sizeof(__entry->ss)) : memset(&__entry->ss, 0, sizeof(__entry->ss));
- __entry->flags = xprt ? xprt->xpt_flags : 0;
+ __entry->xprt = xprt;
+ if (xprt) {
+ memcpy(__get_dynamic_array(addr),
+ &xprt->xpt_remote,
+ xprt->xpt_remotelen);
+ __entry->flags = xprt->xpt_flags;
+ } else
+ __entry->flags = 0;
),
TP_printk("xprt=0x%p addr=%pIScp flags=%s", __entry->xprt,
- (struct sockaddr *)&__entry->ss,
+ __get_dynamic_array_len(addr) != 0 ?
+ (struct sockaddr *)__get_dynamic_array(addr) : NULL,
show_svc_xprt_flags(__entry->flags))
);
@@ -592,19 +606,26 @@ TRACE_EVENT(svc_handle_xprt,
TP_STRUCT__entry(
__field(struct svc_xprt *, xprt)
__field(int, len)
- __field_struct(struct sockaddr_storage, ss)
__field(unsigned long, flags)
+ __dynamic_array(unsigned char, addr, xprt != NULL ?
+ xprt->xpt_remotelen : 0)
),
TP_fast_assign(
__entry->xprt = xprt;
- xprt ? memcpy(&__entry->ss, &xprt->xpt_remote, sizeof(__entry->ss)) : memset(&__entry->ss, 0, sizeof(__entry->ss));
__entry->len = len;
- __entry->flags = xprt ? xprt->xpt_flags : 0;
+ if (xprt) {
+ memcpy(__get_dynamic_array(addr),
+ &xprt->xpt_remote,
+ xprt->xpt_remotelen);
+ __entry->flags = xprt->xpt_flags;
+ } else
+ __entry->flags = 0;
),
TP_printk("xprt=0x%p addr=%pIScp len=%d flags=%s", __entry->xprt,
- (struct sockaddr *)&__entry->ss,
+ __get_dynamic_array_len(addr) != 0 ?
+ (struct sockaddr *)__get_dynamic_array(addr) : NULL,
__entry->len, show_svc_xprt_flags(__entry->flags))
);
#endif /* _TRACE_SUNRPC_H */
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from trond.myklebust@primarydata.com are
queue-4.4/nfs-don-t-create-zero-length-requests.patch
queue-4.4/sunrpc-don-t-allocate-a-full-sockaddr_storage-for-tracing.patch
reply other threads:[~2016-08-18 13:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1471526019239158@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=bfields@redhat.com \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=trond.myklebust@primarydata.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox