From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: ebiggers@google.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, tytso@mit.edu
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "fscrypto: only allow setting encryption policy on directories" has been added to the 4.7-stable tree
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2016 17:18:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1473693533248218@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
fscrypto: only allow setting encryption policy on directories
to the 4.7-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
fscrypto-only-allow-setting-encryption-policy-on-directories.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.7 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From 002ced4be6429918800ce3e41d5cbc2d7c01822c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2016 11:36:39 -0700
Subject: fscrypto: only allow setting encryption policy on directories
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
commit 002ced4be6429918800ce3e41d5cbc2d7c01822c upstream.
The FS_IOC_SET_ENCRYPTION_POLICY ioctl allowed setting an encryption
policy on nondirectory files. This was unintentional, and in the case
of nonempty regular files did not behave as expected because existing
data was not actually encrypted by the ioctl.
In the case of ext4, the user could also trigger filesystem errors in
->empty_dir(), e.g. due to mismatched "directory" checksums when the
kernel incorrectly tried to interpret a regular file as a directory.
This bug affected ext4 with kernels v4.8-rc1 or later and f2fs with
kernels v4.6 and later. It appears that older kernels only permitted
directories and that the check was accidentally lost during the
refactoring to share the file encryption code between ext4 and f2fs.
This patch restores the !S_ISDIR() check that was present in older
kernels.
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
fs/crypto/policy.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
--- a/fs/crypto/policy.c
+++ b/fs/crypto/policy.c
@@ -102,6 +102,8 @@ int fscrypt_process_policy(struct inode
return -EINVAL;
if (!inode_has_encryption_context(inode)) {
+ if (!S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode))
+ return -EINVAL;
if (!inode->i_sb->s_cop->empty_dir)
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
if (!inode->i_sb->s_cop->empty_dir(inode))
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from ebiggers@google.com are
queue-4.7/fscrypto-add-authorization-check-for-setting-encryption-policy.patch
queue-4.7/fscrypto-only-allow-setting-encryption-policy-on-directories.patch
reply other threads:[~2016-09-12 15:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1473693533248218@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=ebiggers@google.com \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).