From: Ander Conselvan De Oliveira <conselvan2@gmail.com>
To: ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Damien Cassou <damien@cassou.me>,
freedesktop.org@gp.mailgun.org, Arno <blouin.arno@gmail.com>,
Shubhangi Shrivastava <shubhangi.shrivastava@intel.com>,
Sivakumar Thulasimani <sivakumar.thulasimani@intel.com>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Move long hpd handling into the hotplug work
Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2016 14:39:16 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1475494756.2635.1.camel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1475481316-8194-1-git-send-email-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
On Mon, 2016-10-03 at 10:55 +0300, ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
>
> We can't rely on connector->status in the detect() hook if the long hpd
> was already handled by the dig_port_work as that won't update
> connector->status. Thus we have to defer the long hpd handling entirely
> until the hotplug work runs to avoid the double long hpd handling
> the "detect_done" flag is trying to prevent.
This is better indeed. But perhaps add a note here about the next patch, since
this one doesn't actually change the use of connector->status usage in detect().
For both patches:
Reviewed-by: Ander Conselvan de Oliveira <conselvan2@gmail.com>
>
> Cc: Damien Cassou <damien@cassou.me>
> Cc: freedesktop.org@gp.mailgun.org
> Cc: Arno <blouin.arno@gmail.com>
> Cc: Shubhangi Shrivastava <shubhangi.shrivastava@intel.com>
> Cc: Sivakumar Thulasimani <sivakumar.thulasimani@intel.com>
> Cc: Ander Conselvan de Oliveira <conselvan2@gmail.com>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Tested-by: Arno <blouin.arno@gmail.com>
> Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=83348
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++------------------
> ---
> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> index 9448d898d80b..96caa469e3a8 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> @@ -4827,36 +4827,34 @@ intel_dp_hpd_pulse(struct intel_digital_port
> *intel_dig_port, bool long_hpd)
> port_name(intel_dig_port->port),
> long_hpd ? "long" : "short");
>
> + if (long_hpd) {
> + intel_dp->detect_done = false;
> + return IRQ_NONE;
> + }
> +
> power_domain = intel_display_port_aux_power_domain(intel_encoder);
> intel_display_power_get(dev_priv, power_domain);
>
> - if (long_hpd) {
> - intel_dp_long_pulse(intel_dp->attached_connector);
> - if (intel_dp->is_mst)
> - ret = IRQ_HANDLED;
> - goto put_power;
> -
> - } else {
> - if (intel_dp->is_mst) {
> - if (intel_dp_check_mst_status(intel_dp) == -EINVAL) {
> - /*
> - * If we were in MST mode, and device is not
> - * there, get out of MST mode
> - */
> - DRM_DEBUG_KMS("MST device may have
> disappeared %d vs %d\n",
> - intel_dp->is_mst, intel_dp-
> >mst_mgr.mst_state);
> - intel_dp->is_mst = false;
> - drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr_set_mst(&intel_dp-
> >mst_mgr,
> - intel_dp-
> >is_mst);
> - goto put_power;
> - }
> + if (intel_dp->is_mst) {
> + if (intel_dp_check_mst_status(intel_dp) == -EINVAL) {
> + /*
> + * If we were in MST mode, and device is not
> + * there, get out of MST mode
> + */
> + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("MST device may have disappeared %d vs
> %d\n",
> + intel_dp->is_mst, intel_dp-
> >mst_mgr.mst_state);
> + intel_dp->is_mst = false;
> + drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr_set_mst(&intel_dp->mst_mgr,
> + intel_dp->is_mst);
> + intel_dp->detect_done = false;
> + goto put_power;
> }
> + }
>
> - if (!intel_dp->is_mst) {
> - if (!intel_dp_short_pulse(intel_dp)) {
> - intel_dp_long_pulse(intel_dp-
> >attached_connector);
> - goto put_power;
> - }
> + if (!intel_dp->is_mst) {
> + if (!intel_dp_short_pulse(intel_dp)) {
> + intel_dp->detect_done = false;
> + goto put_power;
> }
> }
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-03 11:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-03 7:55 [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Move long hpd handling into the hotplug work ville.syrjala
2016-10-03 7:55 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Allow DP to work w/o EDID ville.syrjala
2016-10-03 11:39 ` Ander Conselvan De Oliveira [this message]
2016-10-05 9:49 ` [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Move long hpd handling into the hotplug work Ville Syrjälä
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1475494756.2635.1.camel@gmail.com \
--to=conselvan2@gmail.com \
--cc=blouin.arno@gmail.com \
--cc=damien@cassou.me \
--cc=freedesktop.org@gp.mailgun.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=shubhangi.shrivastava@intel.com \
--cc=sivakumar.thulasimani@intel.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).