From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:59125 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753842AbcJTLvi (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Oct 2016 07:51:38 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098410.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.17/8.16.0.17) with SMTP id u9KBmWOY144075 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2016 07:51:38 -0400 Received: from e36.co.us.ibm.com (e36.co.us.ibm.com [32.97.110.154]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 266w2n8y47-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2016 07:51:37 -0400 Received: from localhost by e36.co.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Thu, 20 Oct 2016 05:51:36 -0600 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/7] megaraid_sas: Do not set MPI2_TYPE_CUDA for JBOD FP path for FW which does not support JBOD sequence map From: James Bottomley To: Greg KH , Sumit Saxena Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, martin.petersen@oracle.com, thenzl@redhat.com, kashyap.desai@broadcom.com, stable@vger.kernel.org Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 07:51:28 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20161020091526.GA22193@kroah.com> References: <1476954305-576-1-git-send-email-sumit.saxena@broadcom.com> <1476954305-576-7-git-send-email-sumit.saxena@broadcom.com> <20161020091526.GA22193@kroah.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <1476964288.3094.4.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, 2016-10-20 at 11:15 +0200, Greg KH wrote: > On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 02:05:04AM -0700, Sumit Saxena wrote: > > CC: stable@vger.kernel.org > > Signed-off-by: Sumit Saxena > > Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke > > Reviewed-by: Tomas Henzl > > --- > > drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_fusion.c | 8 ++++---- > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > I know I reject patches without any changelog text in them, hopefully > the scsi maintainers also do... It depends: for complex patches needing detailed explanations, yes. However, this is a four line change for which the subject seems adequately descriptive, so this particular one seems fine. James