* Re: [PATCH v2 4/7] megaraid_sas: Send SYNCHRONIZE_CACHE command to firmware [not found] <4bc9319fb76ad1a7b80df01beef33710@mail.gmail.com> @ 2016-10-21 12:36 ` James Bottomley 0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: James Bottomley @ 2016-10-21 12:36 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Kashyap Desai, Sumit Saxena, linux-scsi; +Cc: martin.petersen, thenzl, stable On Fri, 2016-10-21 at 17:38 +0530, Kashyap Desai wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: James Bottomley [mailto:jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com] > > Sent: Friday, October 21, 2016 4:32 PM > > To: Sumit Saxena; linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org > > Cc: martin.petersen@oracle.com; thenzl@redhat.com; > > kashyap.desai@broadcom.com; stable@vger.kernel.org > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/7] megaraid_sas: Send SYNCHRONIZE_CACHE > > command to firmware > > > > On Thu, 2016-10-20 at 02:05 -0700, Sumit Saxena wrote: > > > From previous patch we have below changes in v2 - 1. Updated > > > change > > > log. Provided more detail in change log. > > > 2. Agreed to remove module parameter. If we remove module > > > parameter, > > > we > > > can ask customer to disable WCE on drive to get similar > > > impact. > > > 3. Always Send SYNCHRONIZE_CACHE for JBOD (non Raid) Device to > > > Firmware. > > > > > > Current megaraid_sas driver returns SYNCHRONIZE_CACHE(related to > > > Drive > > > Cache) command back to SCSI layer without sending it down to > > > firmware as firmware supposed to take care of flushing disk cache > > > for > > > all drives belongs to Virtual Disk at the time of system > > > reboot/shutdown. > > > > > > We evaluate and understood that for Raid Volume, why driver > > > should not > > > send SYNC_CACHE command to the Firmware. > > > There may be a some reason in past, but now it looks to be not > > > required and we have fixed this issue as part of this patch. > > > > > > Commit- " 02b01e0 [SCSI] megaraid_sas: return sync cache call > > > with > > > success" > > > added the code in driver to return SYNCHRONIZE_CACHE without > > > sending > > > it to firmware back in 2007. Earlier MR was mainly for Virtual > > > Disk, > > > so same code continue for JBOD as well whenever JBOD support was > > > added > > > and it introduced bug that SYNCHRONIZE_CACHE is not passed to FW > > > for > > > JBOD (non Raid disk). > > > > > > But our recent analysis indicates that, From Day-1 MR Firmware > > > always > > > expect Driver to forward SYNCHRONIZE_CACHE for JBOD (non Raid > > > disk) to > > > the Firmware. > > > We have fixed this as part of this patch. > > > > > > - Additional background - > > > There are some instance of MegaRaid FW (E.a Gen2 and Gen2.5 FW) > > > set > > > WCE bit for Virtual Disk but firmware does not reply correct > > > status > > > for SYNCH_CACHE. > > > It is very difficult to find out which Device ID and firmware has > > > capability to manage SYNC_CACHE, so we managed to figure out > > > which are > > > the new firmware (canHandleSyncCache is set in scratch pad > > > register at > > > 0xB4) and use that interface for correct behavior as explained > > > above. > > > > > > E.g Liberator/Thunderbolt MegaRaid FW returns SYNC_CACHE as > > > Unsupported command (this is a firmware bug) and eventually > > > command > > > will be failed to SML. > > > This will cause File system to go Read-only. > > > > > > - New behavior described - > > > > > > IF application requests SYNCH_CACHE > > > IF 'JBOD' > > > Driver sends SYNCH_CACHE command to the FW > > > FW sends SYNCH_CACHE to drive > > > FW obtains status from drive and returns same > > > status > > > back to driver > > > ELSEIF 'VirtualDisk' > > > IF any FW which supports new API bit called > > > canHandleSyncCache > > > Driver sends SYNCH_CACHE command to > > > the > > > FW > > > FW does not send SYNCH_CACHE to > > > drives > > > FW returns SUCCESS > > > ELSE > > > Driver does not send SYNCH_CACHE > > > command > > > to the FW. > > > Driver return SUCCESS for that > > > command. > > > ENDIF > > > ENDIF > > > ENDIF > > > > > > CC: stable@vger.kernel.org > > > > Can you please split this into two, so we can backport the bug fix > > without > > any of > > the feature addition junk? > > James - I am sending new patch making two logical fix as you > requested. JBOD fix will be marked for CC:stable and for Virtual disk > I will post only for head (not for stable). Let me know if resending > complete series is good or resending this patch is better. This is up to Martin, because he has to sort it out, but I think we can cope with just the two patches. The bug fix one has to go into the fixes branch for immediate application and the rest of the series will go into the misc branch for the 4.10 merge window. James > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Kashyap Desai <kashyap.desai@broadcom.com> > > > Signed-off-by: Sumit Saxena <sumit.saxena@broadcom.com> > > > --- > > > drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas.h | 3 +++ > > > drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_base.c | 10 ++-------- > > > drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_fusion.c | 5 +++++ > > > 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas.h > > > b/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas.h > > > index ca86c88..43fd14f 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas.h > > > +++ b/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas.h > > > @@ -1429,6 +1429,8 @@ enum FW_BOOT_CONTEXT { > > > #define MR_MAX_REPLY_QUEUES_EXT_OFFSET_SHIFT 14 > > > #define MR_MAX_MSIX_REG_ARRAY 16 > > > #define MR_RDPQ_MODE_OFFSET 0X00800000 > > > +#define MR_CAN_HANDLE_SYNC_CACHE_OFFSET 0X0100000 > > > 0 > > > + > > > /* > > > * register set for both 1068 and 1078 controllers > > > * structure extended for 1078 registers @@ -2140,6 +2142,7 @@ > > > struct > > > megasas_instance { > > > u8 is_imr; > > > u8 is_rdpq; > > > bool dev_handle; > > > + bool fw_sync_cache_support; > > > }; > > > struct MR_LD_VF_MAP { > > > u32 size; > > > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_base.c > > > b/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_base.c > > > index 3236632..f7a2ab1 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_base.c > > > +++ b/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_base.c > > > @@ -1700,16 +1700,10 @@ inline int megasas_cmd_type(struct > > > scsi_cmnd > > > *cmd) > > > goto out_done; > > > } > > > > > > - switch (scmd->cmnd[0]) { > > > - case SYNCHRONIZE_CACHE: > > > - /* > > > - * FW takes care of flush cache on its own > > > - * No need to send it down > > > - */ > > > + if (MEGASAS_IS_LOGICAL(scmd) && (scmd->cmnd[0] == > > > SYNCHRONIZE_CACHE) && > > > + (!instance->fw_sync_cache_support)) { > > > scmd->result = DID_OK << 16; > > > goto out_done; > > > > This, minus the "&& (!instance->fw_sync_cache_support)" is all we > > need > > for the > > bug fix, correct? > Yes. I will be sending patch for the same. It need only below check > for > JBOD fix. > if ((scmd->cmnd[0] == SYNCHRONIZE_CACHE) && > MEGASAS_IS_LOGICAL(scmd)) > { > > > > > James > > > > > - default: > > > - break; > > > } > > > > > > return instance->instancet > > > ->build_and_issue_cmd(instance, > > > scmd); > > > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_fusion.c > > > b/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_fusion.c > > > index 2159f6a..2e61306 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_fusion.c > > > +++ b/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_fusion.c > > > @@ -748,6 +748,11 @@ static int > > > megasas_create_sg_sense_fusion(struct > > > megasas_instance *instance) > > > goto fail_fw_init; > > > } > > > > > > + instance->fw_sync_cache_support = (scratch_pad_2 & > > > + MR_CAN_HANDLE_SYNC_CACHE_OFFSET) ? 1 : 0; > > > + dev_info(&instance->pdev->dev, "FW supports sync > > > cache\t: > > > %s\n", > > > + instance->fw_sync_cache_support ? "Yes" : > > > "No"); > > > + > > > IOCInitMessage = > > > dma_alloc_coherent(&instance->pdev->dev, > > > sizeof(struct > > > MPI2_IOC_INIT_REQUEST), > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" > in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <1476954305-576-1-git-send-email-sumit.saxena@broadcom.com>]
[parent not found: <1476954305-576-5-git-send-email-sumit.saxena@broadcom.com>]
* Re: [PATCH v2 4/7] megaraid_sas: Send SYNCHRONIZE_CACHE command to firmware [not found] ` <1476954305-576-5-git-send-email-sumit.saxena@broadcom.com> @ 2016-10-21 10:01 ` Ric Wheeler 2016-10-21 11:01 ` James Bottomley 1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Ric Wheeler @ 2016-10-21 10:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Sumit Saxena, linux-scsi Cc: martin.petersen, thenzl, jejb, kashyap.desai, stable On 10/20/2016 05:05 AM, Sumit Saxena wrote: > From previous patch we have below changes in v2 - > 1. Updated change log. Provided more detail in change log. > 2. Agreed to remove module parameter. If we remove module parameter, we > can ask customer to disable WCE on drive to get similar impact. > 3. Always Send SYNCHRONIZE_CACHE for JBOD (non Raid) Device to Firmware. Just a note - the user can disable sending the synchronize cache settings by mount time options with a file system (nobarrier) or for raw devices, overriding cache_type. This should never be required unless the target device has some quirk that does not allow it to handle synchronize_cache correctly. Regards, Ric ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 4/7] megaraid_sas: Send SYNCHRONIZE_CACHE command to firmware [not found] ` <1476954305-576-5-git-send-email-sumit.saxena@broadcom.com> 2016-10-21 10:01 ` Ric Wheeler @ 2016-10-21 11:01 ` James Bottomley 2016-10-21 16:01 ` Tomas Henzl 1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: James Bottomley @ 2016-10-21 11:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Sumit Saxena, linux-scsi; +Cc: martin.petersen, thenzl, kashyap.desai, stable On Thu, 2016-10-20 at 02:05 -0700, Sumit Saxena wrote: > From previous patch we have below changes in v2 - > 1. Updated change log. Provided more detail in change log. > 2. Agreed to remove module parameter. If we remove module parameter, > we > can ask customer to disable WCE on drive to get similar impact. > 3. Always Send SYNCHRONIZE_CACHE for JBOD (non Raid) Device to > Firmware. > > Current megaraid_sas driver returns SYNCHRONIZE_CACHE(related to > Drive > Cache) command back to SCSI layer without sending it down to > firmware as > firmware supposed to take care of flushing disk cache for all drives > belongs to Virtual Disk at the time of system reboot/shutdown. > > We evaluate and understood that for Raid Volume, why driver should > not > send SYNC_CACHE command to the Firmware. > There may be a some reason in past, but now it looks to be not > required and > we have fixed this issue as part of this patch. > > Commit- " 02b01e0 [SCSI] megaraid_sas: return sync cache call with > success" > added the code in driver to return SYNCHRONIZE_CACHE without sending > it to > firmware back in 2007. Earlier MR was mainly for Virtual Disk, > so same code continue for JBOD as well whenever JBOD support was > added and it introduced bug that > SYNCHRONIZE_CACHE is not passed to FW for JBOD (non Raid disk). > > But our recent analysis indicates that, From Day-1 MR Firmware always > expect Driver to forward SYNCHRONIZE_CACHE for JBOD (non Raid disk) > to the > Firmware. > We have fixed this as part of this patch. > > - Additional background - > There are some instance of MegaRaid FW (E.a Gen2 and Gen2.5 FW) set > WCE bit > for Virtual Disk but firmware does not reply correct status for > SYNCH_CACHE. > It is very difficult to find out which Device ID and firmware has > capability > to manage SYNC_CACHE, so we managed to figure out which are the new > firmware > (canHandleSyncCache is set in scratch pad register at 0xB4) and use > that > interface for correct behavior as explained above. > > E.g Liberator/Thunderbolt MegaRaid FW returns SYNC_CACHE as > Unsupported > command (this is a firmware bug) and eventually command will be > failed to SML. > This will cause File system to go Read-only. > > - New behavior described - > > IF application requests SYNCH_CACHE > IF 'JBOD' > Driver sends SYNCH_CACHE command to the FW > FW sends SYNCH_CACHE to drive > FW obtains status from drive and returns same status > back to driver > ELSEIF 'VirtualDisk' > IF any FW which supports new API bit called > canHandleSyncCache > Driver sends SYNCH_CACHE command to the > FW > FW does not send SYNCH_CACHE to drives > FW returns SUCCESS > ELSE > Driver does not send SYNCH_CACHE > command to the FW. > Driver return SUCCESS for that command. > ENDIF > ENDIF > ENDIF > > CC: stable@vger.kernel.org Can you please split this into two, so we can backport the bug fix without any of the feature addition junk? > Signed-off-by: Kashyap Desai <kashyap.desai@broadcom.com> > Signed-off-by: Sumit Saxena <sumit.saxena@broadcom.com> > --- > drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas.h | 3 +++ > drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_base.c | 10 ++-------- > drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_fusion.c | 5 +++++ > 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas.h > b/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas.h > index ca86c88..43fd14f 100644 > --- a/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas.h > +++ b/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas.h > @@ -1429,6 +1429,8 @@ enum FW_BOOT_CONTEXT { > #define MR_MAX_REPLY_QUEUES_EXT_OFFSET_SHIFT 14 > #define MR_MAX_MSIX_REG_ARRAY 16 > #define MR_RDPQ_MODE_OFFSET 0X00800000 > +#define MR_CAN_HANDLE_SYNC_CACHE_OFFSET 0X01000000 > + > /* > * register set for both 1068 and 1078 controllers > * structure extended for 1078 registers > @@ -2140,6 +2142,7 @@ struct megasas_instance { > u8 is_imr; > u8 is_rdpq; > bool dev_handle; > + bool fw_sync_cache_support; > }; > struct MR_LD_VF_MAP { > u32 size; > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_base.c > b/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_base.c > index 3236632..f7a2ab1 100644 > --- a/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_base.c > +++ b/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_base.c > @@ -1700,16 +1700,10 @@ inline int megasas_cmd_type(struct scsi_cmnd > *cmd) > goto out_done; > } > > - switch (scmd->cmnd[0]) { > - case SYNCHRONIZE_CACHE: > - /* > - * FW takes care of flush cache on its own > - * No need to send it down > - */ > + if (MEGASAS_IS_LOGICAL(scmd) && (scmd->cmnd[0] == > SYNCHRONIZE_CACHE) && > + (!instance->fw_sync_cache_support)) { > scmd->result = DID_OK << 16; > goto out_done; This, minus the "&& (!instance->fw_sync_cache_support)" is all we need for the bug fix, correct? James > - default: > - break; > } > > return instance->instancet->build_and_issue_cmd(instance, > scmd); > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_fusion.c > b/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_fusion.c > index 2159f6a..2e61306 100644 > --- a/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_fusion.c > +++ b/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_fusion.c > @@ -748,6 +748,11 @@ static int megasas_create_sg_sense_fusion(struct > megasas_instance *instance) > goto fail_fw_init; > } > > + instance->fw_sync_cache_support = (scratch_pad_2 & > + MR_CAN_HANDLE_SYNC_CACHE_OFFSET) ? 1 : 0; > + dev_info(&instance->pdev->dev, "FW supports sync cache\t: > %s\n", > + instance->fw_sync_cache_support ? "Yes" : "No"); > + > IOCInitMessage = > dma_alloc_coherent(&instance->pdev->dev, > sizeof(struct MPI2_IOC_INIT_REQUEST), ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 4/7] megaraid_sas: Send SYNCHRONIZE_CACHE command to firmware 2016-10-21 11:01 ` James Bottomley @ 2016-10-21 16:01 ` Tomas Henzl 0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Tomas Henzl @ 2016-10-21 16:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: James Bottomley, Sumit Saxena, linux-scsi Cc: martin.petersen, kashyap.desai, stable On 21.10.2016 13:01, James Bottomley wrote: > On Thu, 2016-10-20 at 02:05 -0700, Sumit Saxena wrote: >> From previous patch we have below changes in v2 - >> 1. Updated change log. Provided more detail in change log. >> 2. Agreed to remove module parameter. If we remove module parameter, >> we >> can ask customer to disable WCE on drive to get similar impact. >> 3. Always Send SYNCHRONIZE_CACHE for JBOD (non Raid) Device to >> Firmware. >> >> Current megaraid_sas driver returns SYNCHRONIZE_CACHE(related to >> Drive >> Cache) command back to SCSI layer without sending it down to >> firmware as >> firmware supposed to take care of flushing disk cache for all drives >> belongs to Virtual Disk at the time of system reboot/shutdown. >> >> We evaluate and understood that for Raid Volume, why driver should >> not >> send SYNC_CACHE command to the Firmware. >> There may be a some reason in past, but now it looks to be not >> required and >> we have fixed this issue as part of this patch. >> >> Commit- " 02b01e0 [SCSI] megaraid_sas: return sync cache call with >> success" >> added the code in driver to return SYNCHRONIZE_CACHE without sending >> it to >> firmware back in 2007. Earlier MR was mainly for Virtual Disk, >> so same code continue for JBOD as well whenever JBOD support was >> added and it introduced bug that >> SYNCHRONIZE_CACHE is not passed to FW for JBOD (non Raid disk). >> >> But our recent analysis indicates that, From Day-1 MR Firmware always >> expect Driver to forward SYNCHRONIZE_CACHE for JBOD (non Raid disk) >> to the >> Firmware. >> We have fixed this as part of this patch. >> >> - Additional background - >> There are some instance of MegaRaid FW (E.a Gen2 and Gen2.5 FW) set >> WCE bit >> for Virtual Disk but firmware does not reply correct status for >> SYNCH_CACHE. >> It is very difficult to find out which Device ID and firmware has >> capability >> to manage SYNC_CACHE, so we managed to figure out which are the new >> firmware >> (canHandleSyncCache is set in scratch pad register at 0xB4) and use >> that >> interface for correct behavior as explained above. >> >> E.g Liberator/Thunderbolt MegaRaid FW returns SYNC_CACHE as >> Unsupported >> command (this is a firmware bug) and eventually command will be >> failed to SML. >> This will cause File system to go Read-only. >> >> - New behavior described - >> >> IF application requests SYNCH_CACHE >> IF 'JBOD' >> Driver sends SYNCH_CACHE command to the FW >> FW sends SYNCH_CACHE to drive >> FW obtains status from drive and returns same status >> back to driver >> ELSEIF 'VirtualDisk' >> IF any FW which supports new API bit called >> canHandleSyncCache >> Driver sends SYNCH_CACHE command to the >> FW >> FW does not send SYNCH_CACHE to drives >> FW returns SUCCESS >> ELSE >> Driver does not send SYNCH_CACHE >> command to the FW. >> Driver return SUCCESS for that command. >> ENDIF >> ENDIF >> ENDIF >> >> CC: stable@vger.kernel.org > Can you please split this into two, so we can backport the bug fix > without any of the feature addition junk? > >> Signed-off-by: Kashyap Desai <kashyap.desai@broadcom.com> >> Signed-off-by: Sumit Saxena <sumit.saxena@broadcom.com> >> --- >> drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas.h | 3 +++ >> drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_base.c | 10 ++-------- >> drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_fusion.c | 5 +++++ >> 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas.h >> b/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas.h >> index ca86c88..43fd14f 100644 >> --- a/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas.h >> +++ b/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas.h >> @@ -1429,6 +1429,8 @@ enum FW_BOOT_CONTEXT { >> #define MR_MAX_REPLY_QUEUES_EXT_OFFSET_SHIFT 14 >> #define MR_MAX_MSIX_REG_ARRAY 16 >> #define MR_RDPQ_MODE_OFFSET 0X00800000 >> +#define MR_CAN_HANDLE_SYNC_CACHE_OFFSET 0X01000000 >> + >> /* >> * register set for both 1068 and 1078 controllers >> * structure extended for 1078 registers >> @@ -2140,6 +2142,7 @@ struct megasas_instance { >> u8 is_imr; >> u8 is_rdpq; >> bool dev_handle; >> + bool fw_sync_cache_support; >> }; >> struct MR_LD_VF_MAP { >> u32 size; >> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_base.c >> b/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_base.c >> index 3236632..f7a2ab1 100644 >> --- a/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_base.c >> +++ b/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_base.c >> @@ -1700,16 +1700,10 @@ inline int megasas_cmd_type(struct scsi_cmnd >> *cmd) >> goto out_done; >> } >> >> - switch (scmd->cmnd[0]) { >> - case SYNCHRONIZE_CACHE: >> - /* >> - * FW takes care of flush cache on its own >> - * No need to send it down >> - */ >> + if (MEGASAS_IS_LOGICAL(scmd) && (scmd->cmnd[0] == >> SYNCHRONIZE_CACHE) && >> + (!instance->fw_sync_cache_support)) { >> scmd->result = DID_OK << 16; >> goto out_done; > This, minus the "&& (!instance->fw_sync_cache_support)" is all we need > for the bug fix, correct? Isn't both a) sending SYNC to JBOD and b) sending SYNC to logical luns a bugfix of the same kind? > > James > >> - default: >> - break; >> } >> >> return instance->instancet->build_and_issue_cmd(instance, >> scmd); >> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_fusion.c >> b/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_fusion.c >> index 2159f6a..2e61306 100644 >> --- a/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_fusion.c >> +++ b/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_fusion.c >> @@ -748,6 +748,11 @@ static int megasas_create_sg_sense_fusion(struct >> megasas_instance *instance) >> goto fail_fw_init; >> } >> >> + instance->fw_sync_cache_support = (scratch_pad_2 & >> + MR_CAN_HANDLE_SYNC_CACHE_OFFSET) ? 1 : 0; >> + dev_info(&instance->pdev->dev, "FW supports sync cache\t: >> %s\n", >> + instance->fw_sync_cache_support ? "Yes" : "No"); >> + >> IOCInitMessage = >> dma_alloc_coherent(&instance->pdev->dev, >> sizeof(struct MPI2_IOC_INIT_REQUEST), > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-10-21 16:01 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <4bc9319fb76ad1a7b80df01beef33710@mail.gmail.com>
2016-10-21 12:36 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] megaraid_sas: Send SYNCHRONIZE_CACHE command to firmware James Bottomley
[not found] <1476954305-576-1-git-send-email-sumit.saxena@broadcom.com>
[not found] ` <1476954305-576-5-git-send-email-sumit.saxena@broadcom.com>
2016-10-21 10:01 ` Ric Wheeler
2016-10-21 11:01 ` James Bottomley
2016-10-21 16:01 ` Tomas Henzl
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).