* Patch "x86/e820: Don't merge consecutive E820_PRAM ranges" has been added to the 4.4-stable tree
@ 2016-10-26 9:26 gregkh
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: gregkh @ 2016-10-26 9:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dan.j.williams, bp, brgerst, david, dvlasenk, gregkh, hpa, jmoyer,
jpoimboe, luto, mingo, peterz, tglx, torvalds, yizhan
Cc: stable, stable-commits
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
x86/e820: Don't merge consecutive E820_PRAM ranges
to the 4.4-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
x86-e820-don-t-merge-consecutive-e820_pram-ranges.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.4 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From 23446cb66c073b827779e5eb3dec301623299b32 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 11:01:48 -0700
Subject: x86/e820: Don't merge consecutive E820_PRAM ranges
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
commit 23446cb66c073b827779e5eb3dec301623299b32 upstream.
Commit:
917db484dc6a ("x86/boot: Fix kdump, cleanup aborted E820_PRAM max_pfn manipulation")
... fixed up the broken manipulations of max_pfn in the presence of
E820_PRAM ranges.
However, it also broke the sanitize_e820_map() support for not merging
E820_PRAM ranges.
Re-introduce the enabling to keep resource boundaries between
consecutive defined ranges. Otherwise, for example, an environment that
boots with memmap=2G!8G,2G!10G will end up with a single 4G /dev/pmem0
device instead of a /dev/pmem0 and /dev/pmem1 device 2G in size.
Reported-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Zhang Yi <yizhan@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
Fixes: 917db484dc6a ("x86/boot: Fix kdump, cleanup aborted E820_PRAM max_pfn manipulation")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/147629530854.10618.10383744751594021268.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
arch/x86/kernel/e820.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c
@@ -347,7 +347,7 @@ int __init sanitize_e820_map(struct e820
* continue building up new bios map based on this
* information
*/
- if (current_type != last_type) {
+ if (current_type != last_type || current_type == E820_PRAM) {
if (last_type != 0) {
new_bios[new_bios_entry].size =
change_point[chgidx]->addr - last_addr;
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from dan.j.williams@intel.com are
queue-4.4/acpi-nfit-check-for-the-correct-event-code-in-notifications.patch
queue-4.4/x86-e820-don-t-merge-consecutive-e820_pram-ranges.patch
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2016-10-26 9:27 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-10-26 9:26 Patch "x86/e820: Don't merge consecutive E820_PRAM ranges" has been added to the 4.4-stable tree gregkh
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).