From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: will.deacon@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] arm64: swp emulation: bound LL/SC retries before rescheduling" failed to apply to 4.4-stable tree
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 13:52:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1477482724205207@kroah.com> (raw)
The patch below does not apply to the 4.4-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
>From 1c5b51dfb7b4564008e0cadec5381a69e88b0d21 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2016 16:59:43 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] arm64: swp emulation: bound LL/SC retries before rescheduling
If a CPU does not implement a global monitor for certain memory types,
then userspace can attempt a kernel DoS by issuing SWP instructions
targetting the problematic memory (for example, a framebuffer mapped
with non-cacheable attributes).
The SWP emulation code protects against these sorts of attacks by
checking for pending signals and potentially rescheduling when the STXR
instruction fails during the emulation. Whilst this is good for avoiding
livelock, it harms emulation of legitimate SWP instructions on CPUs
where forward progress is not guaranteed if there are memory accesses to
the same reservation granule (up to 2k) between the failing STXR and
the retry of the LDXR.
This patch solves the problem by retrying the STXR a bounded number of
times (4) before breaking out of the LL/SC loop and looking for
something else to do.
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Fixes: bd35a4adc413 ("arm64: Port SWP/SWPB emulation support from arm")
Reviewed-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/armv8_deprecated.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/armv8_deprecated.c
index 42ffdb54e162..b0988bb1bf64 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/armv8_deprecated.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/armv8_deprecated.c
@@ -280,35 +280,43 @@ static void __init register_insn_emulation_sysctl(struct ctl_table *table)
/*
* Error-checking SWP macros implemented using ldxr{b}/stxr{b}
*/
-#define __user_swpX_asm(data, addr, res, temp, B) \
+
+/* Arbitrary constant to ensure forward-progress of the LL/SC loop */
+#define __SWP_LL_SC_LOOPS 4
+
+#define __user_swpX_asm(data, addr, res, temp, temp2, B) \
__asm__ __volatile__( \
+ " mov %w3, %w7\n" \
ALTERNATIVE("nop", SET_PSTATE_PAN(0), ARM64_HAS_PAN, \
CONFIG_ARM64_PAN) \
- "0: ldxr"B" %w2, [%3]\n" \
- "1: stxr"B" %w0, %w1, [%3]\n" \
+ "0: ldxr"B" %w2, [%4]\n" \
+ "1: stxr"B" %w0, %w1, [%4]\n" \
" cbz %w0, 2f\n" \
- " mov %w0, %w4\n" \
+ " sub %w3, %w3, #1\n" \
+ " cbnz %w3, 0b\n" \
+ " mov %w0, %w5\n" \
" b 3f\n" \
"2:\n" \
" mov %w1, %w2\n" \
"3:\n" \
" .pushsection .fixup,\"ax\"\n" \
" .align 2\n" \
- "4: mov %w0, %w5\n" \
+ "4: mov %w0, %w6\n" \
" b 3b\n" \
" .popsection" \
_ASM_EXTABLE(0b, 4b) \
_ASM_EXTABLE(1b, 4b) \
ALTERNATIVE("nop", SET_PSTATE_PAN(1), ARM64_HAS_PAN, \
CONFIG_ARM64_PAN) \
- : "=&r" (res), "+r" (data), "=&r" (temp) \
- : "r" (addr), "i" (-EAGAIN), "i" (-EFAULT) \
+ : "=&r" (res), "+r" (data), "=&r" (temp), "=&r" (temp2) \
+ : "r" (addr), "i" (-EAGAIN), "i" (-EFAULT), \
+ "i" (__SWP_LL_SC_LOOPS) \
: "memory")
-#define __user_swp_asm(data, addr, res, temp) \
- __user_swpX_asm(data, addr, res, temp, "")
-#define __user_swpb_asm(data, addr, res, temp) \
- __user_swpX_asm(data, addr, res, temp, "b")
+#define __user_swp_asm(data, addr, res, temp, temp2) \
+ __user_swpX_asm(data, addr, res, temp, temp2, "")
+#define __user_swpb_asm(data, addr, res, temp, temp2) \
+ __user_swpX_asm(data, addr, res, temp, temp2, "b")
/*
* Bit 22 of the instruction encoding distinguishes between
@@ -328,12 +336,12 @@ static int emulate_swpX(unsigned int address, unsigned int *data,
}
while (1) {
- unsigned long temp;
+ unsigned long temp, temp2;
if (type == TYPE_SWPB)
- __user_swpb_asm(*data, address, res, temp);
+ __user_swpb_asm(*data, address, res, temp, temp2);
else
- __user_swp_asm(*data, address, res, temp);
+ __user_swp_asm(*data, address, res, temp, temp2);
if (likely(res != -EAGAIN) || signal_pending(current))
break;
reply other threads:[~2016-10-26 11:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1477482724205207@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).