From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: matt.redfearn@imgtec.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, mst@redhat.com
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "virtio: console: Unlock vqs while freeing buffers" has been added to the 4.4-stable tree
Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2016 17:30:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <147862263678237@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
virtio: console: Unlock vqs while freeing buffers
to the 4.4-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
virtio-console-unlock-vqs-while-freeing-buffers.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.4 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From 34563769e438d2881f62cf4d9badc4e589ac0ec0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Matt Redfearn <matt.redfearn@imgtec.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2016 12:05:15 +0100
Subject: virtio: console: Unlock vqs while freeing buffers
From: Matt Redfearn <matt.redfearn@imgtec.com>
commit 34563769e438d2881f62cf4d9badc4e589ac0ec0 upstream.
Commit c6017e793b93 ("virtio: console: add locks around buffer removal
in port unplug path") added locking around the freeing of buffers in the
vq. However, when free_buf() is called with can_sleep = true and rproc
is enabled, it calls dma_free_coherent() directly, requiring interrupts
to be enabled. Currently a WARNING is triggered due to the spin locking
around free_buf, with a call stack like this:
WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 121 at ./include/linux/dma-mapping.h:433
free_buf+0x1a8/0x288
Call Trace:
[<8040c538>] show_stack+0x74/0xc0
[<80757240>] dump_stack+0xd0/0x110
[<80430d98>] __warn+0xfc/0x130
[<80430ee0>] warn_slowpath_null+0x2c/0x3c
[<807e7c6c>] free_buf+0x1a8/0x288
[<807ea590>] remove_port_data+0x50/0xac
[<807ea6a0>] unplug_port+0xb4/0x1bc
[<807ea858>] virtcons_remove+0xb0/0xfc
[<807b6734>] virtio_dev_remove+0x58/0xc0
[<807f918c>] __device_release_driver+0xac/0x134
[<807f924c>] device_release_driver+0x38/0x50
[<807f7edc>] bus_remove_device+0xfc/0x130
[<807f4b74>] device_del+0x17c/0x21c
[<807f4c38>] device_unregister+0x24/0x38
[<807b6b50>] unregister_virtio_device+0x28/0x44
Fix this by restructuring the loops to allow the locks to only be taken
where it is necessary to protect the vqs, and release it while the
buffer is being freed.
Fixes: c6017e793b93 ("virtio: console: add locks around buffer removal in port unplug path")
Signed-off-by: Matt Redfearn <matt.redfearn@imgtec.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/char/virtio_console.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/char/virtio_console.c
+++ b/drivers/char/virtio_console.c
@@ -1533,19 +1533,29 @@ static void remove_port_data(struct port
spin_lock_irq(&port->inbuf_lock);
/* Remove unused data this port might have received. */
discard_port_data(port);
+ spin_unlock_irq(&port->inbuf_lock);
/* Remove buffers we queued up for the Host to send us data in. */
- while ((buf = virtqueue_detach_unused_buf(port->in_vq)))
- free_buf(buf, true);
- spin_unlock_irq(&port->inbuf_lock);
+ do {
+ spin_lock_irq(&port->inbuf_lock);
+ buf = virtqueue_detach_unused_buf(port->in_vq);
+ spin_unlock_irq(&port->inbuf_lock);
+ if (buf)
+ free_buf(buf, true);
+ } while (buf);
spin_lock_irq(&port->outvq_lock);
reclaim_consumed_buffers(port);
+ spin_unlock_irq(&port->outvq_lock);
/* Free pending buffers from the out-queue. */
- while ((buf = virtqueue_detach_unused_buf(port->out_vq)))
- free_buf(buf, true);
- spin_unlock_irq(&port->outvq_lock);
+ do {
+ spin_lock_irq(&port->outvq_lock);
+ buf = virtqueue_detach_unused_buf(port->out_vq);
+ spin_unlock_irq(&port->outvq_lock);
+ if (buf)
+ free_buf(buf, true);
+ } while (buf);
}
/*
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from matt.redfearn@imgtec.com are
queue-4.4/virtio-console-unlock-vqs-while-freeing-buffers.patch
reply other threads:[~2016-11-08 16:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=147862263678237@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=matt.redfearn@imgtec.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).