From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, davem@davemloft.net,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, subashab@codeaurora.org,
xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "netlink: Call cb->done from a worker thread" has been added to the 4.4-stable tree
Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2016 07:20:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <14811780203994@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
netlink: Call cb->done from a worker thread
to the 4.4-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
netlink-call-cb-done-from-a-worker-thread.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.4 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From foo@baz Thu Dec 8 07:18:57 CET 2016
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 19:22:12 +0800
Subject: netlink: Call cb->done from a worker thread
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
[ Upstream commit 707693c8a498697aa8db240b93eb76ec62e30892 ]
The cb->done interface expects to be called in process context.
This was broken by the netlink RCU conversion. This patch fixes
it by adding a worker struct to make the cb->done call where
necessary.
Fixes: 21e4902aea80 ("netlink: Lockless lookup with RCU grace...")
Reported-by: Subash Abhinov Kasiviswanathan <subashab@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Acked-by: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
net/netlink/af_netlink.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++----
net/netlink/af_netlink.h | 2 ++
2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
--- a/net/netlink/af_netlink.c
+++ b/net/netlink/af_netlink.c
@@ -924,14 +924,11 @@ static void netlink_skb_set_owner_r(stru
sk_mem_charge(sk, skb->truesize);
}
-static void netlink_sock_destruct(struct sock *sk)
+static void __netlink_sock_destruct(struct sock *sk)
{
struct netlink_sock *nlk = nlk_sk(sk);
if (nlk->cb_running) {
- if (nlk->cb.done)
- nlk->cb.done(&nlk->cb);
-
module_put(nlk->cb.module);
kfree_skb(nlk->cb.skb);
}
@@ -960,6 +957,28 @@ static void netlink_sock_destruct(struct
WARN_ON(nlk_sk(sk)->groups);
}
+static void netlink_sock_destruct_work(struct work_struct *work)
+{
+ struct netlink_sock *nlk = container_of(work, struct netlink_sock,
+ work);
+
+ nlk->cb.done(&nlk->cb);
+ __netlink_sock_destruct(&nlk->sk);
+}
+
+static void netlink_sock_destruct(struct sock *sk)
+{
+ struct netlink_sock *nlk = nlk_sk(sk);
+
+ if (nlk->cb_running && nlk->cb.done) {
+ INIT_WORK(&nlk->work, netlink_sock_destruct_work);
+ schedule_work(&nlk->work);
+ return;
+ }
+
+ __netlink_sock_destruct(sk);
+}
+
/* This lock without WQ_FLAG_EXCLUSIVE is good on UP and it is _very_ bad on
* SMP. Look, when several writers sleep and reader wakes them up, all but one
* immediately hit write lock and grab all the cpus. Exclusive sleep solves
--- a/net/netlink/af_netlink.h
+++ b/net/netlink/af_netlink.h
@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
#include <linux/rhashtable.h>
#include <linux/atomic.h>
+#include <linux/workqueue.h>
#include <net/sock.h>
#define NLGRPSZ(x) (ALIGN(x, sizeof(unsigned long) * 8) / 8)
@@ -53,6 +54,7 @@ struct netlink_sock {
struct rhash_head node;
struct rcu_head rcu;
+ struct work_struct work;
};
static inline struct netlink_sock *nlk_sk(struct sock *sk)
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from herbert@gondor.apana.org.au are
queue-4.4/netlink-do-not-schedule-work-from-sk_destruct.patch
queue-4.4/netlink-call-cb-done-from-a-worker-thread.patch
reply other threads:[~2016-12-08 6:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=14811780203994@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=subashab@codeaurora.org \
--cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).