From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:57526 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752619AbcLHGVS (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Dec 2016 01:21:18 -0500 Subject: Patch "sparc64: fix compile warning section mismatch in find_node()" has been added to the 4.4-stable tree To: thomas.tai@oracle.com, davem@davemloft.net, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Cc: , From: Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2016 07:20:23 +0100 Message-ID: <148117802368129@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ANSI_X3.4-1968 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled sparc64: fix compile warning section mismatch in find_node() to the 4.4-stable tree which can be found at: http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary The filename of the patch is: sparc64-fix-compile-warning-section-mismatch-in-find_node.patch and it can be found in the queue-4.4 subdirectory. If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let know about it. >>From foo@baz Thu Dec 8 07:19:49 CET 2016 From: Thomas Tai Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2016 16:41:00 -0800 Subject: sparc64: fix compile warning section mismatch in find_node() From: Thomas Tai [ Upstream commit 87a349f9cc0908bc0cfac0c9ece3179f650ae95a ] A compile warning is introduced by a commit to fix the find_node(). This patch fix the compile warning by moving find_node() into __init section. Because find_node() is only used by memblock_nid_range() which is only used by a __init add_node_ranges(). find_node() and memblock_nid_range() should also be inside __init section. Signed-off-by: Thomas Tai Signed-off-by: David S. Miller Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- arch/sparc/mm/init_64.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) --- a/arch/sparc/mm/init_64.c +++ b/arch/sparc/mm/init_64.c @@ -803,7 +803,7 @@ static int num_mblocks; static int find_numa_node_for_addr(unsigned long pa, struct node_mem_mask *pnode_mask); -static unsigned long ra_to_pa(unsigned long addr) +static unsigned long __init ra_to_pa(unsigned long addr) { int i; @@ -819,7 +819,7 @@ static unsigned long ra_to_pa(unsigned l return addr; } -static int find_node(unsigned long addr) +static int __init find_node(unsigned long addr) { static bool search_mdesc = true; static struct node_mem_mask last_mem_mask = { ~0UL, ~0UL }; @@ -856,7 +856,7 @@ static int find_node(unsigned long addr) return last_index; } -static u64 memblock_nid_range(u64 start, u64 end, int *nid) +static u64 __init memblock_nid_range(u64 start, u64 end, int *nid) { *nid = find_node(start); start += PAGE_SIZE; Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from thomas.tai@oracle.com are queue-4.4/sparc64-fix-compile-warning-section-mismatch-in-find_node.patch queue-4.4/sparc64-fix-find_node-warning-if-numa-node-cannot-be-found.patch