Patch "Btrfs: return gracefully from balance if fs tree is corrupted" has been added to the 4.4-stable tree

Patch "Btrfs: return gracefully from balance if fs tree is corrupted" has been added to the 4.4-stable tree

[gregkh]

This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    Btrfs: return gracefully from balance if fs tree is corrupted

to the 4.4-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     btrfs-return-gracefully-from-balance-if-fs-tree-is-corrupted.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.4 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.


>From 3561b9db70928f207be4570b48fc19898eeaef54 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 08:51:46 -0700
Subject: Btrfs: return gracefully from balance if fs tree is corrupted

From: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>

commit 3561b9db70928f207be4570b48fc19898eeaef54 upstream.

When relocating tree blocks, we firstly get block information from
back references in the extent tree, we then search fs tree to try to
find all parents of a block.

However, if fs tree is corrupted, eg. if there're some missing
items, we could come across these WARN_ONs and BUG_ONs.

This makes us print some error messages and return gracefully
from balance.

Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 fs/btrfs/relocation.c |   23 +++++++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/btrfs/relocation.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/relocation.c
@@ -921,9 +921,16 @@ again:
 			path2->slots[level]--;
 
 		eb = path2->nodes[level];
-		WARN_ON(btrfs_node_blockptr(eb, path2->slots[level]) !=
-			cur->bytenr);
-
+		if (btrfs_node_blockptr(eb, path2->slots[level]) !=
+		    cur->bytenr) {
+			btrfs_err(root->fs_info,
+	"couldn't find block (%llu) (level %d) in tree (%llu) with key (%llu %u %llu)",
+				  cur->bytenr, level - 1, root->objectid,
+				  node_key->objectid, node_key->type,
+				  node_key->offset);
+			err = -ENOENT;
+			goto out;
+		}
 		lower = cur;
 		need_check = true;
 		for (; level < BTRFS_MAX_LEVEL; level++) {
@@ -2676,11 +2683,15 @@ static int do_relocation(struct btrfs_tr
 
 		if (!upper->eb) {
 			ret = btrfs_search_slot(trans, root, key, path, 0, 1);
-			if (ret < 0) {
-				err = ret;
+			if (ret) {
+				if (ret < 0)
+					err = ret;
+				else
+					err = -ENOENT;
+
+				btrfs_release_path(path);
 				break;
 			}
-			BUG_ON(ret > 0);
 
 			if (!upper->eb) {
 				upper->eb = path->nodes[upper->level];


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from bo.li.liu@oracle.com are

queue-4.4/btrfs-fix-memory-leak-in-reading-btree-blocks.patch
queue-4.4/btrfs-bail-out-if-block-group-has-different-mixed-flag.patch
queue-4.4/btrfs-return-gracefully-from-balance-if-fs-tree-is-corrupted.patch
queue-4.4/btrfs-don-t-bug-during-drop-snapshot.patch
queue-4.4/btrfs-fix-memory-leak-in-do_walk_down.patch