From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: asarai@suse.de, crosbymichael@gmail.com,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "fs: exec: apply CLOEXEC before changing dumpable task flags" has been added to the 4.8-stable tree
Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2017 11:06:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1483524419236249@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
fs: exec: apply CLOEXEC before changing dumpable task flags
to the 4.8-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
fs-exec-apply-cloexec-before-changing-dumpable-task-flags.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.8 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From 613cc2b6f272c1a8ad33aefa21cad77af23139f7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Aleksa Sarai <asarai@suse.de>
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 16:26:24 +1100
Subject: fs: exec: apply CLOEXEC before changing dumpable task flags
From: Aleksa Sarai <asarai@suse.de>
commit 613cc2b6f272c1a8ad33aefa21cad77af23139f7 upstream.
If you have a process that has set itself to be non-dumpable, and it
then undergoes exec(2), any CLOEXEC file descriptors it has open are
"exposed" during a race window between the dumpable flags of the process
being reset for exec(2) and CLOEXEC being applied to the file
descriptors. This can be exploited by a process by attempting to access
/proc/<pid>/fd/... during this window, without requiring CAP_SYS_PTRACE.
The race in question is after set_dumpable has been (for get_link,
though the trace is basically the same for readlink):
[vfs]
-> proc_pid_link_inode_operations.get_link
-> proc_pid_get_link
-> proc_fd_access_allowed
-> ptrace_may_access(task, PTRACE_MODE_READ_FSCREDS);
Which will return 0, during the race window and CLOEXEC file descriptors
will still be open during this window because do_close_on_exec has not
been called yet. As a result, the ordering of these calls should be
reversed to avoid this race window.
This is of particular concern to container runtimes, where joining a
PID namespace with file descriptors referring to the host filesystem
can result in security issues (since PRCTL_SET_DUMPABLE doesn't protect
against access of CLOEXEC file descriptors -- file descriptors which may
reference filesystem objects the container shouldn't have access to).
Cc: dev@opencontainers.org
Reported-by: Michael Crosby <crosbymichael@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Aleksa Sarai <asarai@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
fs/exec.c | 10 ++++++++--
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/exec.c
+++ b/fs/exec.c
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
* current->executable is only used by the procfs. This allows a dispatch
* table to check for several different types of binary formats. We keep
* trying until we recognize the file or we run out of supported binary
- * formats.
+ * formats.
*/
#include <linux/slab.h>
@@ -1261,6 +1261,13 @@ int flush_old_exec(struct linux_binprm *
flush_thread();
current->personality &= ~bprm->per_clear;
+ /*
+ * We have to apply CLOEXEC before we change whether the process is
+ * dumpable (in setup_new_exec) to avoid a race with a process in userspace
+ * trying to access the should-be-closed file descriptors of a process
+ * undergoing exec(2).
+ */
+ do_close_on_exec(current->files);
return 0;
out:
@@ -1323,7 +1330,6 @@ void setup_new_exec(struct linux_binprm
group */
current->self_exec_id++;
flush_signal_handlers(current, 0);
- do_close_on_exec(current->files);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(setup_new_exec);
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from asarai@suse.de are
queue-4.8/fs-exec-apply-cloexec-before-changing-dumpable-task-flags.patch
reply other threads:[~2017-01-04 10:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1483524419236249@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=asarai@suse.de \
--cc=crosbymichael@gmail.com \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).