* FAILED: patch "[PATCH] staging: lustre: ldlm: pl_recalc time handling is wrong" failed to apply to 4.4-stable tree
@ 2017-01-06 13:32 gregkh
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: gregkh @ 2017-01-06 13:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: arnd, gregkh, jsimmons; +Cc: stable
The patch below does not apply to the 4.4-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
>From b8cb86fd95bb461c3496e1f4b4083b198c963a9c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 16:21:20 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] staging: lustre: ldlm: pl_recalc time handling is wrong
James Simmons reports:
> The ldlm_pool field pl_recalc_time is set to the current
> monotonic clock value but the interval period is calculated
> with the wall clock. This means the interval period will
> always be far larger than the pl_recalc_period, which is
> just a small interval time period. The correct thing to
> do is to use monotomic clock current value instead of the
> wall clocks value when calculating recalc_interval_sec.
This broke when I converted the 32-bit get_seconds() into
ktime_get_{real_,}seconds() inconsistently. Either
one of those two would have worked, but mixing them
does not.
Staying with the original intention of the patch, this
changes the ktime_get_seconds() calls into ktime_get_real_seconds(),
using real time instead of mononic time.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.4+
Fixes: 8f83409cf238 ("staging/lustre: use 64-bit time for pl_recalc")
Reported-by: James Simmons <jsimmons@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Reviewed-by: James Simmons <jsimmons@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_pool.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_pool.c
index 19831c555c49..b820309d70e3 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_pool.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_pool.c
@@ -356,10 +356,10 @@ static int ldlm_pool_recalc(struct ldlm_pool *pl)
u32 recalc_interval_sec;
int count;
- recalc_interval_sec = ktime_get_seconds() - pl->pl_recalc_time;
+ recalc_interval_sec = ktime_get_real_seconds() - pl->pl_recalc_time;
if (recalc_interval_sec > 0) {
spin_lock(&pl->pl_lock);
- recalc_interval_sec = ktime_get_seconds() - pl->pl_recalc_time;
+ recalc_interval_sec = ktime_get_real_seconds() - pl->pl_recalc_time;
if (recalc_interval_sec > 0) {
/*
@@ -382,7 +382,7 @@ static int ldlm_pool_recalc(struct ldlm_pool *pl)
count);
}
- recalc_interval_sec = pl->pl_recalc_time - ktime_get_seconds() +
+ recalc_interval_sec = pl->pl_recalc_time - ktime_get_real_seconds() +
pl->pl_recalc_period;
if (recalc_interval_sec <= 0) {
/* DEBUG: should be re-removed after LU-4536 is fixed */
@@ -657,7 +657,7 @@ int ldlm_pool_init(struct ldlm_pool *pl, struct ldlm_namespace *ns,
spin_lock_init(&pl->pl_lock);
atomic_set(&pl->pl_granted, 0);
- pl->pl_recalc_time = ktime_get_seconds();
+ pl->pl_recalc_time = ktime_get_real_seconds();
atomic_set(&pl->pl_lock_volume_factor, 1);
atomic_set(&pl->pl_grant_rate, 0);
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2017-01-06 13:32 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-01-06 13:32 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] staging: lustre: ldlm: pl_recalc time handling is wrong" failed to apply to 4.4-stable tree gregkh
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).