From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: ebiggers@google.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, richard@nod.at,
tytso@mit.edu
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "fscrypt: fix renaming and linking special files" has been added to the 4.9-stable tree
Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2017 09:36:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <148395098273234@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
fscrypt: fix renaming and linking special files
to the 4.9-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
fscrypt-fix-renaming-and-linking-special-files.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.9 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From 42d97eb0ade31e1bc537d086842f5d6e766d9d51 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2016 14:20:13 -0800
Subject: fscrypt: fix renaming and linking special files
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
commit 42d97eb0ade31e1bc537d086842f5d6e766d9d51 upstream.
Attempting to link a device node, named pipe, or socket file into an
encrypted directory through rename(2) or link(2) always failed with
EPERM. This happened because fscrypt_has_permitted_context() saw that
the file was unencrypted and forbid creating the link. This behavior
was unexpected because such files are never encrypted; only regular
files, directories, and symlinks can be encrypted.
To fix this, make fscrypt_has_permitted_context() always return true on
special files.
This will be covered by a test in my encryption xfstests patchset.
Fixes: 9bd8212f981e ("ext4 crypto: add encryption policy and password salt support")
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
fs/crypto/policy.c | 5 +++++
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
--- a/fs/crypto/policy.c
+++ b/fs/crypto/policy.c
@@ -171,6 +171,11 @@ int fscrypt_has_permitted_context(struct
BUG_ON(1);
}
+ /* No restrictions on file types which are never encrypted */
+ if (!S_ISREG(child->i_mode) && !S_ISDIR(child->i_mode) &&
+ !S_ISLNK(child->i_mode))
+ return 1;
+
/* no restrictions if the parent directory is not encrypted */
if (!parent->i_sb->s_cop->is_encrypted(parent))
return 1;
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from ebiggers@google.com are
queue-4.9/fscrypt-fix-renaming-and-linking-special-files.patch
reply other threads:[~2017-01-09 8:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=148395098273234@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=ebiggers@google.com \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).