From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
jkosina@suse.cz
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "HID: sensor-hub: Move the memset to sensor_hub_get_feature()" has been added to the 4.9-stable tree
Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2017 09:36:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <14839509827483@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
HID: sensor-hub: Move the memset to sensor_hub_get_feature()
to the 4.9-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
hid-sensor-hub-move-the-memset-to-sensor_hub_get_feature.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.9 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From 143fca77cce906d35f7a60ccef648e888df589f2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2016 08:57:59 -0800
Subject: HID: sensor-hub: Move the memset to sensor_hub_get_feature()
From: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
commit 143fca77cce906d35f7a60ccef648e888df589f2 upstream.
While applying patch d443a0aa3a29: "HID: hid-sensor-hub: clear memory to
avoid random data", there was some issues in applying correct version of
the patch. This resulted in the breakage of sensor functions as all
request like power-up will be reset by the memset() in the function
sensor_hub_set_feature().
The reset of caller buffer should be in the function
sensor_hub_get_feature(), not in the sensor_hub_set_feature().
Fixes: d443a0aa3a29 ("HID: hid-sensor-hub: clear memory to avoid random data")
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/hid/hid-sensor-hub.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/drivers/hid/hid-sensor-hub.c
+++ b/drivers/hid/hid-sensor-hub.c
@@ -212,7 +212,6 @@ int sensor_hub_set_feature(struct hid_se
__s32 value;
int ret = 0;
- memset(buffer, 0, buffer_size);
mutex_lock(&data->mutex);
report = sensor_hub_report(report_id, hsdev->hdev, HID_FEATURE_REPORT);
if (!report || (field_index >= report->maxfield)) {
@@ -256,6 +255,8 @@ int sensor_hub_get_feature(struct hid_se
int buffer_index = 0;
int i;
+ memset(buffer, 0, buffer_size);
+
mutex_lock(&data->mutex);
report = sensor_hub_report(report_id, hsdev->hdev, HID_FEATURE_REPORT);
if (!report || (field_index >= report->maxfield) ||
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com are
queue-4.9/hid-sensor-hub-move-the-memset-to-sensor_hub_get_feature.patch
reply other threads:[~2017-01-09 8:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=14839509827483@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jkosina@suse.cz \
--cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).