Patch "drm/i915/gen9: unconditionally apply the memory bandwidth WA" has been added to the 4.9-stable tree

[<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>]

This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    drm/i915/gen9: unconditionally apply the memory bandwidth WA

to the 4.9-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     drm-i915-gen9-unconditionally-apply-the-memory-bandwidth-wa.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.9 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.


>From ee3d532fcb64872bc20be0ee58f7afdb9fa82abe Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2016 15:25:38 -0300
Subject: drm/i915/gen9: unconditionally apply the memory bandwidth WA

From: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>

commit ee3d532fcb64872bc20be0ee58f7afdb9fa82abe upstream.

Mahesh Kumar is already working on a proper implementation for the
workaround, but while we still don't have it, let's just
unconditionally apply the workaround for everybody and we hope we can
close all those numerous bugzilla tickets. Also, I'm not sure how easy
it will be to backport the final implementation to the stable Kernels,
and this patch here is probably easier to backport.

At the present moment I still don't have confirmation that this patch
fixes any of the bugs listed below, but we should definitely try
testing all of them again.

v2: s/intel_needs_memory_bw_wa/skl_needs_memory_bw_wa/ (Lyude).
v3: Rebase (dev -> dev_priv change on ilk_wm_max_level).

Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94337
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94605
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94884
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95010
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96226
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96828
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97450
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97830
Cc: Mahesh Kumar <mahesh1.kumar@intel.com>
Cc: Lyude <cpaul@redhat.com>
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lyude <cpaul@redhat.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1476210338-9797-1-git-send-email-paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c |   49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
@@ -2879,6 +2879,21 @@ skl_wm_plane_id(const struct intel_plane
 	}
 }
 
+/*
+ * FIXME: We still don't have the proper code detect if we need to apply the WA,
+ * so assume we'll always need it in order to avoid underruns.
+ */
+static bool skl_needs_memory_bw_wa(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
+{
+	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(state->base.dev);
+
+	if (IS_SKYLAKE(dev_priv) || IS_BROXTON(dev_priv) ||
+	    IS_KABYLAKE(dev_priv))
+		return true;
+
+	return false;
+}
+
 static bool
 intel_has_sagv(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
 {
@@ -2999,9 +3014,10 @@ bool intel_can_enable_sagv(struct drm_at
 	struct drm_device *dev = state->dev;
 	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);
 	struct intel_atomic_state *intel_state = to_intel_atomic_state(state);
-	struct drm_crtc *crtc;
+	struct intel_crtc *crtc;
+	struct intel_plane *plane;
 	enum pipe pipe;
-	int level, plane;
+	int level, id, latency;
 
 	if (!intel_has_sagv(dev_priv))
 		return false;
@@ -3019,27 +3035,36 @@ bool intel_can_enable_sagv(struct drm_at
 
 	/* Since we're now guaranteed to only have one active CRTC... */
 	pipe = ffs(intel_state->active_crtcs) - 1;
-	crtc = dev_priv->pipe_to_crtc_mapping[pipe];
+	crtc = to_intel_crtc(dev_priv->pipe_to_crtc_mapping[pipe]);
 
-	if (crtc->state->mode.flags & DRM_MODE_FLAG_INTERLACE)
+	if (crtc->base.state->mode.flags & DRM_MODE_FLAG_INTERLACE)
 		return false;
 
-	for_each_plane(dev_priv, pipe, plane) {
+	for_each_intel_plane_on_crtc(dev, crtc, plane) {
+		id = skl_wm_plane_id(plane);
+
 		/* Skip this plane if it's not enabled */
-		if (intel_state->wm_results.plane[pipe][plane][0] == 0)
+		if (intel_state->wm_results.plane[pipe][id][0] == 0)
 			continue;
 
 		/* Find the highest enabled wm level for this plane */
 		for (level = ilk_wm_max_level(dev);
-		     intel_state->wm_results.plane[pipe][plane][level] == 0; --level)
+		     intel_state->wm_results.plane[pipe][id][level] == 0; --level)
 		     { }
 
+		latency = dev_priv->wm.skl_latency[level];
+
+		if (skl_needs_memory_bw_wa(intel_state) &&
+		    plane->base.state->fb->modifier[0] ==
+		    I915_FORMAT_MOD_X_TILED)
+			latency += 15;
+
 		/*
 		 * If any of the planes on this pipe don't enable wm levels
 		 * that incur memory latencies higher then 30µs we can't enable
 		 * the SAGV
 		 */
-		if (dev_priv->wm.skl_latency[level] < SKL_SAGV_BLOCK_TIME)
+		if (latency < SKL_SAGV_BLOCK_TIME)
 			return false;
 	}
 
@@ -3549,12 +3574,18 @@ static int skl_compute_plane_wm(const st
 	uint32_t width = 0, height = 0;
 	uint32_t plane_pixel_rate;
 	uint32_t y_tile_minimum, y_min_scanlines;
+	struct intel_atomic_state *state =
+		to_intel_atomic_state(cstate->base.state);
+	bool apply_memory_bw_wa = skl_needs_memory_bw_wa(state);
 
 	if (latency == 0 || !cstate->base.active || !intel_pstate->base.visible) {
 		*enabled = false;
 		return 0;
 	}
 
+	if (apply_memory_bw_wa && fb->modifier[0] == I915_FORMAT_MOD_X_TILED)
+		latency += 15;
+
 	width = drm_rect_width(&intel_pstate->base.src) >> 16;
 	height = drm_rect_height(&intel_pstate->base.src) >> 16;
 
@@ -3606,6 +3637,8 @@ static int skl_compute_plane_wm(const st
 				 plane_blocks_per_line);
 
 	y_tile_minimum = plane_blocks_per_line * y_min_scanlines;
+	if (apply_memory_bw_wa)
+		y_tile_minimum *= 2;
 
 	if (fb->modifier[0] == I915_FORMAT_MOD_Y_TILED ||
 	    fb->modifier[0] == I915_FORMAT_MOD_Yf_TILED) {


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com are

queue-4.9/drm-i915-gen9-fix-the-wm-memory-bandwidth-wa-for-y-tiling-cases.patch
queue-4.9/drm-i915-gen9-unconditionally-apply-the-memory-bandwidth-wa.patch
queue-4.9/drm-i915-disable-psr-by-default-on-hsw-bdw.patch