From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: oohall@gmail.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, anton@samba.org,
arnd@arndb.de, benh@kernel.crashing.org,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, mgorman@techsingularity.net,
paulus@samba.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "mm/init: fix zone boundary creation" has been added to the 4.4-stable tree
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2017 11:57:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1484305021132221@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
mm/init: fix zone boundary creation
to the 4.4-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
mm-init-fix-zone-boundary-creation.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.4 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From 90cae1fe1c3540f791d5b8e025985fa5e699b2bb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2016 15:22:17 -0700
Subject: mm/init: fix zone boundary creation
From: Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com>
commit 90cae1fe1c3540f791d5b8e025985fa5e699b2bb upstream.
As a part of memory initialisation the architecture passes an array to
free_area_init_nodes() which specifies the max PFN of each memory zone.
This array is not necessarily monotonic (due to unused zones) so this
array is parsed to build monotonic lists of the min and max PFN for each
zone. ZONE_MOVABLE is special cased here as its limits are managed by
the mm subsystem rather than the architecture. Unfortunately, this
special casing is broken when ZONE_MOVABLE is the not the last zone in
the zone list. The core of the issue is:
if (i == ZONE_MOVABLE)
continue;
arch_zone_lowest_possible_pfn[i] =
arch_zone_highest_possible_pfn[i-1];
As ZONE_MOVABLE is skipped the lowest_possible_pfn of the next zone will
be set to zero. This patch fixes this bug by adding explicitly tracking
where the next zone should start rather than relying on the contents
arch_zone_highest_possible_pfn[].
Thie is low priority. To get bitten by this you need to enable a zone
that appears after ZONE_MOVABLE in the zone_type enum. As far as I can
tell this means running a kernel with ZONE_DEVICE or ZONE_CMA enabled,
so I can't see this affecting too many people.
I only noticed this because I've been fiddling with ZONE_DEVICE on
powerpc and 4.6 broke my test kernel. This bug, in conjunction with the
changes in Taku Izumi's kernelcore=mirror patch (d91749c1dda71) and
powerpc being the odd architecture which initialises max_zone_pfn[] to
~0ul instead of 0 caused all of system memory to be placed into
ZONE_DEVICE at boot, followed a panic since device memory cannot be used
for kernel allocations. I've already submitted a patch to fix the
powerpc specific bits, but I figured this should be fixed too.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1462435033-15601-1-git-send-email-oohall@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com>
Cc: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
mm/page_alloc.c | 17 ++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -5696,15 +5696,18 @@ void __init free_area_init_nodes(unsigne
sizeof(arch_zone_lowest_possible_pfn));
memset(arch_zone_highest_possible_pfn, 0,
sizeof(arch_zone_highest_possible_pfn));
- arch_zone_lowest_possible_pfn[0] = find_min_pfn_with_active_regions();
- arch_zone_highest_possible_pfn[0] = max_zone_pfn[0];
- for (i = 1; i < MAX_NR_ZONES; i++) {
+
+ start_pfn = find_min_pfn_with_active_regions();
+
+ for (i = 0; i < MAX_NR_ZONES; i++) {
if (i == ZONE_MOVABLE)
continue;
- arch_zone_lowest_possible_pfn[i] =
- arch_zone_highest_possible_pfn[i-1];
- arch_zone_highest_possible_pfn[i] =
- max(max_zone_pfn[i], arch_zone_lowest_possible_pfn[i]);
+
+ end_pfn = max(max_zone_pfn[i], start_pfn);
+ arch_zone_lowest_possible_pfn[i] = start_pfn;
+ arch_zone_highest_possible_pfn[i] = end_pfn;
+
+ start_pfn = end_pfn;
}
arch_zone_lowest_possible_pfn[ZONE_MOVABLE] = 0;
arch_zone_highest_possible_pfn[ZONE_MOVABLE] = 0;
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from oohall@gmail.com are
queue-4.4/mm-init-fix-zone-boundary-creation.patch
reply other threads:[~2017-01-13 10:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1484305021132221@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=anton@samba.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=oohall@gmail.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).