From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: jeffm@suse.com, bo.li.liu@oracle.com, dsterba@suse.com,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "btrfs: fix locking when we put back a delayed ref that's too new" has been added to the 4.4-stable tree
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 17:11:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <14846694771961@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
btrfs: fix locking when we put back a delayed ref that's too new
to the 4.4-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
btrfs-fix-locking-when-we-put-back-a-delayed-ref-that-s-too-new.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.4 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From d0280996437081dd12ed1e982ac8aeaa62835ec4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 13:28:28 -0500
Subject: btrfs: fix locking when we put back a delayed ref that's too new
From: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
commit d0280996437081dd12ed1e982ac8aeaa62835ec4 upstream.
In __btrfs_run_delayed_refs, when we put back a delayed ref that's too
new, we have already dropped the lock on locked_ref when we set
->processing = 0.
This patch keeps the lock to cover that assignment.
Fixes: d7df2c796d7 (Btrfs: attach delayed ref updates to delayed ref heads)
Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
@@ -2520,11 +2520,11 @@ static noinline int __btrfs_run_delayed_
if (ref && ref->seq &&
btrfs_check_delayed_seq(fs_info, delayed_refs, ref->seq)) {
spin_unlock(&locked_ref->lock);
- btrfs_delayed_ref_unlock(locked_ref);
spin_lock(&delayed_refs->lock);
locked_ref->processing = 0;
delayed_refs->num_heads_ready++;
spin_unlock(&delayed_refs->lock);
+ btrfs_delayed_ref_unlock(locked_ref);
locked_ref = NULL;
cond_resched();
count++;
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from jeffm@suse.com are
queue-4.4/btrfs-fix-error-handling-when-run_delayed_extent_op-fails.patch
queue-4.4/btrfs-fix-locking-when-we-put-back-a-delayed-ref-that-s-too-new.patch
reply other threads:[~2017-01-17 16:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=14846694771961@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=bo.li.liu@oracle.com \
--cc=dsterba@suse.com \
--cc=jeffm@suse.com \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).