Patch "powercap/intel_rapl: fix and tidy up error handling" has been added to the 4.9-stable tree

Patch "powercap/intel_rapl: fix and tidy up error handling" has been added to the 4.9-stable tree

[gregkh]

This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    powercap/intel_rapl: fix and tidy up error handling

to the 4.9-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     powercap-intel_rapl-fix-and-tidy-up-error-handling.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.9 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.


>From cb43f81b8489dcb87555e16c17453f0a9fa690f2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 13:53:11 -0800
Subject: powercap/intel_rapl: fix and tidy up error handling

From: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>

commit cb43f81b8489dcb87555e16c17453f0a9fa690f2 upstream.

Commit e1399ba20eee ("powercap / RAPL: handle missing MSRs") added
contraint_to_pl() function to return index into an array. But it
can potentially return -EINVAL if powercap layer sends an out of
range constraint ID. This patch adds sanity check.

Unnecessary RAPL domain pointer check is removed since it must be
initialized before calling rapl_unit_xlate().

Fixes: e1399ba20eee ("powercap / RAPL: handle missing MSRs")
Reported-by: Odzioba, Lukasz <lukasz.odzioba@intel.com>
Reported-by: Koss, Marcin <marcin.koss@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/powercap/intel_rapl.c |   25 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/drivers/powercap/intel_rapl.c
+++ b/drivers/powercap/intel_rapl.c
@@ -442,6 +442,7 @@ static int contraint_to_pl(struct rapl_d
 			return i;
 		}
 	}
+	pr_err("Cannot find matching power limit for constraint %d\n", cid);
 
 	return -EINVAL;
 }
@@ -457,6 +458,10 @@ static int set_power_limit(struct powerc
 	get_online_cpus();
 	rd = power_zone_to_rapl_domain(power_zone);
 	id = contraint_to_pl(rd, cid);
+	if (id < 0) {
+		ret = id;
+		goto set_exit;
+	}
 
 	rp = rd->rp;
 
@@ -496,6 +501,11 @@ static int get_current_power_limit(struc
 	get_online_cpus();
 	rd = power_zone_to_rapl_domain(power_zone);
 	id = contraint_to_pl(rd, cid);
+	if (id < 0) {
+		ret = id;
+		goto get_exit;
+	}
+
 	switch (rd->rpl[id].prim_id) {
 	case PL1_ENABLE:
 		prim = POWER_LIMIT1;
@@ -512,6 +522,7 @@ static int get_current_power_limit(struc
 	else
 		*data = val;
 
+get_exit:
 	put_online_cpus();
 
 	return ret;
@@ -527,6 +538,10 @@ static int set_time_window(struct powerc
 	get_online_cpus();
 	rd = power_zone_to_rapl_domain(power_zone);
 	id = contraint_to_pl(rd, cid);
+	if (id < 0) {
+		ret = id;
+		goto set_time_exit;
+	}
 
 	switch (rd->rpl[id].prim_id) {
 	case PL1_ENABLE:
@@ -538,6 +553,8 @@ static int set_time_window(struct powerc
 	default:
 		ret = -EINVAL;
 	}
+
+set_time_exit:
 	put_online_cpus();
 	return ret;
 }
@@ -552,6 +569,10 @@ static int get_time_window(struct powerc
 	get_online_cpus();
 	rd = power_zone_to_rapl_domain(power_zone);
 	id = contraint_to_pl(rd, cid);
+	if (id < 0) {
+		ret = id;
+		goto get_time_exit;
+	}
 
 	switch (rd->rpl[id].prim_id) {
 	case PL1_ENABLE:
@@ -566,6 +587,8 @@ static int get_time_window(struct powerc
 	}
 	if (!ret)
 		*data = val;
+
+get_time_exit:
 	put_online_cpus();
 
 	return ret;
@@ -707,7 +730,7 @@ static u64 rapl_unit_xlate(struct rapl_d
 	case ENERGY_UNIT:
 		scale = ENERGY_UNIT_SCALE;
 		/* per domain unit takes precedence */
-		if (rd && rd->domain_energy_unit)
+		if (rd->domain_energy_unit)
 			units = rd->domain_energy_unit;
 		else
 			units = rp->energy_unit;


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com are

queue-4.9/powercap-intel_rapl-fix-and-tidy-up-error-handling.patch