From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:58546 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751074AbdBBKTX (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Feb 2017 05:19:23 -0500 Subject: Patch "xfs: make the ASSERT() condition likely" has been added to the 4.9-stable tree To: hch@lst.de, amir73il@gmail.com, darrick.wong@oracle.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Cc: , From: Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2017 11:18:06 +0100 In-Reply-To: <1486022171-8076-7-git-send-email-hch@lst.de> Message-ID: <1486030686126183@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ANSI_X3.4-1968 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled xfs: make the ASSERT() condition likely to the 4.9-stable tree which can be found at: http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary The filename of the patch is: xfs-make-the-assert-condition-likely.patch and it can be found in the queue-4.9 subdirectory. If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let know about it. >>From hch@lst.de Thu Feb 2 11:13:35 2017 From: Christoph Hellwig Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2017 08:55:58 +0100 Subject: xfs: make the ASSERT() condition likely To: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, Amir Goldstein , "Darrick J. Wong" Message-ID: <1486022171-8076-7-git-send-email-hch@lst.de> From: Amir Goldstein commit bf46ecc3d8cca05f2907cf482755c42c2b11a79d upstream. The ASSERT() condition is the normal case, not the exception, so testing the condition should be likely(), not unlikely(). Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- fs/xfs/xfs_linux.h | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_linux.h +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_linux.h @@ -330,11 +330,11 @@ static inline __uint64_t howmany_64(__ui } #define ASSERT_ALWAYS(expr) \ - (unlikely(expr) ? (void)0 : assfail(#expr, __FILE__, __LINE__)) + (likely(expr) ? (void)0 : assfail(#expr, __FILE__, __LINE__)) #ifdef DEBUG #define ASSERT(expr) \ - (unlikely(expr) ? (void)0 : assfail(#expr, __FILE__, __LINE__)) + (likely(expr) ? (void)0 : assfail(#expr, __FILE__, __LINE__)) #ifndef STATIC # define STATIC noinline @@ -345,7 +345,7 @@ static inline __uint64_t howmany_64(__ui #ifdef XFS_WARN #define ASSERT(expr) \ - (unlikely(expr) ? (void)0 : asswarn(#expr, __FILE__, __LINE__)) + (likely(expr) ? (void)0 : asswarn(#expr, __FILE__, __LINE__)) #ifndef STATIC # define STATIC static noinline Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from hch@lst.de are queue-4.9/xfs-don-t-rely-on-total-in-xfs_alloc_space_available.patch queue-4.9/xfs-replace-xfs_mode_to_ftype-table-with-switch-statement.patch queue-4.9/xfs-fix-bogus-minleft-manipulations.patch queue-4.9/xfs-fix-cow-writeback-race.patch queue-4.9/xfs-sanity-check-inode-mode-when-creating-new-dentry.patch queue-4.9/xfs-extsize-hints-are-not-unlikely-in-xfs_bmap_btalloc.patch queue-4.9/xfs-bump-up-reserved-blocks-in-xfs_alloc_set_aside.patch queue-4.9/xfs-add-missing-include-dependencies-to-xfs_dir2.h.patch queue-4.9/xfs-fix-bmv_count-confusion-w-shared-extents.patch queue-4.9/xfs-adjust-allocation-length-in-xfs_alloc_space_available.patch queue-4.9/xfs-verify-dirblocklog-correctly.patch queue-4.9/xfs-fix-xfs_mode_to_ftype-prototype.patch queue-4.9/xfs-clear-_xbf_pages-from-buffers-when-readahead-page.patch queue-4.9/xfs-remove-racy-hasattr-check-from-attr-ops.patch queue-4.9/xfs-make-the-assert-condition-likely.patch queue-4.9/xfs-sanity-check-directory-inode-di_size.patch queue-4.9/xfs-don-t-print-warnings-when-xfs_log_force-fails.patch queue-4.9/xfs-don-t-wrap-id-in-xfs_dq_get_next_id.patch queue-4.9/xfs-sanity-check-inode-di_mode.patch