From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: dougmill@linux.vnet.ibm.com, axboe@fb.com,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, tj@kernel.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "percpu-refcount: fix reference leak during percpu-atomic transition" has been added to the 4.4-stable tree
Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2017 14:12:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1486213958131113@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
percpu-refcount: fix reference leak during percpu-atomic transition
to the 4.4-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
percpu-refcount-fix-reference-leak-during-percpu-atomic-transition.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.4 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From 966d2b04e070bc040319aaebfec09e0144dc3341 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Douglas Miller <dougmill@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2017 06:42:20 -0600
Subject: percpu-refcount: fix reference leak during percpu-atomic transition
From: Douglas Miller <dougmill@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
commit 966d2b04e070bc040319aaebfec09e0144dc3341 upstream.
percpu_ref_tryget() and percpu_ref_tryget_live() should return
"true" IFF they acquire a reference. But the return value from
atomic_long_inc_not_zero() is a long and may have high bits set,
e.g. PERCPU_COUNT_BIAS, and the return value of the tryget routines
is bool so the reference may actually be acquired but the routines
return "false" which results in a reference leak since the caller
assumes it does not need to do a corresponding percpu_ref_put().
This was seen when performing CPU hotplug during I/O, as hangs in
blk_mq_freeze_queue_wait where percpu_ref_kill (blk_mq_freeze_queue_start)
raced with percpu_ref_tryget (blk_mq_timeout_work).
Sample stack trace:
__switch_to+0x2c0/0x450
__schedule+0x2f8/0x970
schedule+0x48/0xc0
blk_mq_freeze_queue_wait+0x94/0x120
blk_mq_queue_reinit_work+0xb8/0x180
blk_mq_queue_reinit_prepare+0x84/0xa0
cpuhp_invoke_callback+0x17c/0x600
cpuhp_up_callbacks+0x58/0x150
_cpu_up+0xf0/0x1c0
do_cpu_up+0x120/0x150
cpu_subsys_online+0x64/0xe0
device_online+0xb4/0x120
online_store+0xb4/0xc0
dev_attr_store+0x68/0xa0
sysfs_kf_write+0x80/0xb0
kernfs_fop_write+0x17c/0x250
__vfs_write+0x6c/0x1e0
vfs_write+0xd0/0x270
SyS_write+0x6c/0x110
system_call+0x38/0xe0
Examination of the queue showed a single reference (no PERCPU_COUNT_BIAS,
and __PERCPU_REF_DEAD, __PERCPU_REF_ATOMIC set) and no requests.
However, conditions at the time of the race are count of PERCPU_COUNT_BIAS + 0
and __PERCPU_REF_DEAD and __PERCPU_REF_ATOMIC set.
The fix is to make the tryget routines use an actual boolean internally instead
of the atomic long result truncated to a int.
Fixes: e625305b3907 percpu-refcount: make percpu_ref based on longs instead of ints
Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=190751
Signed-off-by: Douglas Miller <dougmill@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Fixes: e625305b3907 ("percpu-refcount: make percpu_ref based on longs instead of ints")
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
include/linux/percpu-refcount.h | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/include/linux/percpu-refcount.h
+++ b/include/linux/percpu-refcount.h
@@ -206,7 +206,7 @@ static inline void percpu_ref_get(struct
static inline bool percpu_ref_tryget(struct percpu_ref *ref)
{
unsigned long __percpu *percpu_count;
- int ret;
+ bool ret;
rcu_read_lock_sched();
@@ -240,7 +240,7 @@ static inline bool percpu_ref_tryget(str
static inline bool percpu_ref_tryget_live(struct percpu_ref *ref)
{
unsigned long __percpu *percpu_count;
- int ret = false;
+ bool ret = false;
rcu_read_lock_sched();
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from dougmill@linux.vnet.ibm.com are
queue-4.4/percpu-refcount-fix-reference-leak-during-percpu-atomic-transition.patch
reply other threads:[~2017-02-04 13:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1486213958131113@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=axboe@fb.com \
--cc=dougmill@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).