From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: rmfrfs@gmail.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, johan@kernel.org,
viresh.kumar@linaro.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "staging: greybus: timesync: validate platform state callback" has been added to the 4.9-stable tree
Date: Sun, 05 Feb 2017 11:26:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <148629041727123@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
staging: greybus: timesync: validate platform state callback
to the 4.9-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
staging-greybus-timesync-validate-platform-state-callback.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.9 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From b17c1bba9cec1727451b906d9a0c209774624873 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rui Miguel Silva <rmfrfs@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2017 16:32:57 +0000
Subject: staging: greybus: timesync: validate platform state callback
From: Rui Miguel Silva <rmfrfs@gmail.com>
commit b17c1bba9cec1727451b906d9a0c209774624873 upstream.
When tearingdown timesync, and not in arche platform, the state platform
callback is not initialized. That will trigger the following NULL
dereferencing.
CallTrace:
? gb_timesync_platform_unlock_bus+0x11/0x20 [greybus]
gb_timesync_teardown+0x85/0xc0 [greybus]
gb_timesync_svc_remove+0xab/0x190 [greybus]
gb_svc_del+0x29/0x110 [greybus]
gb_hd_del+0x14/0x20 [greybus]
ap_disconnect+0x24/0x60 [gb_es2]
usb_unbind_interface+0x7a/0x2c0
__device_release_driver+0x96/0x150
device_release_driver+0x1e/0x30
bus_remove_device+0xe7/0x130
device_del+0x116/0x230
usb_disable_device+0x97/0x1f0
usb_disconnect+0x80/0x260
hub_event+0x5ca/0x10e0
process_one_work+0x126/0x3b0
worker_thread+0x55/0x4c0
? process_one_work+0x3b0/0x3b0
kthread+0xc4/0xe0
? kthread_park+0xb0/0xb0
ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
So, fix that by adding checks before use the callback.
Fixes: 970dc85bd95d ("greybus: timesync: Add timesync core driver")
Signed-off-by: Rui Miguel Silva <rmfrfs@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/staging/greybus/timesync_platform.c | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
--- a/drivers/staging/greybus/timesync_platform.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/greybus/timesync_platform.c
@@ -45,12 +45,18 @@ u32 gb_timesync_platform_get_clock_rate(
int gb_timesync_platform_lock_bus(struct gb_timesync_svc *pdata)
{
+ if (!arche_platform_change_state_cb)
+ return 0;
+
return arche_platform_change_state_cb(ARCHE_PLATFORM_STATE_TIME_SYNC,
pdata);
}
void gb_timesync_platform_unlock_bus(void)
{
+ if (!arche_platform_change_state_cb)
+ return;
+
arche_platform_change_state_cb(ARCHE_PLATFORM_STATE_ACTIVE, NULL);
}
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from rmfrfs@gmail.com are
queue-4.9/staging-greybus-timesync-validate-platform-state-callback.patch
reply other threads:[~2017-02-05 10:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=148629041727123@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=johan@kernel.org \
--cc=rmfrfs@gmail.com \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).