stable.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: shli@fb.com, colyli@suse.de, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
	jinpu.wang@profitbricks.com, neilb@suse.com
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "md/raid1/10: fix potential deadlock" has been added to the 4.9-stable tree
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2017 16:03:11 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <14903677918123@kroah.com> (raw)


This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    md/raid1/10: fix potential deadlock

to the 4.9-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     md-raid1-10-fix-potential-deadlock.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.9 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.


>From 61eb2b43b99ebdc9bc6bc83d9792257b243e7cb3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2017 13:00:20 -0800
Subject: md/raid1/10: fix potential deadlock

From: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>

commit 61eb2b43b99ebdc9bc6bc83d9792257b243e7cb3 upstream.

Neil Brown pointed out a potential deadlock in raid 10 code with
bio_split/chain. The raid1 code could have the same issue, but recent
barrier rework makes it less likely to happen. The deadlock happens in
below sequence:

1. generic_make_request(bio), this will set current->bio_list
2. raid10_make_request will split bio to bio1 and bio2
3. __make_request(bio1), wait_barrer, add underlayer disk bio to
current->bio_list
4. __make_request(bio2), wait_barrer

If raise_barrier happens between 3 & 4, since wait_barrier runs at 3,
raise_barrier waits for IO completion from 3. And since raise_barrier
sets barrier, 4 waits for raise_barrier. But IO from 3 can't be
dispatched because raid10_make_request() doesn't finished yet.

The solution is to adjust the IO ordering. Quotes from Neil:
"
It is much safer to:

    if (need to split) {
        split = bio_split(bio, ...)
        bio_chain(...)
        make_request_fn(split);
        generic_make_request(bio);
   } else
        make_request_fn(mddev, bio);

This way we first process the initial section of the bio (in 'split')
which will queue some requests to the underlying devices.  These
requests will be queued in generic_make_request.
Then we queue the remainder of the bio, which will be added to the end
of the generic_make_request queue.
Then we return.
generic_make_request() will pop the lower-level device requests off the
queue and handle them first.  Then it will process the remainder
of the original bio once the first section has been fully processed.
"

Note, this only happens in read path. In write path, the bio is flushed to
underlaying disks either by blk flush (from schedule) or offladed to raid1/10d.
It's queued in current->bio_list.

Cc: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
Suggested-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Jack Wang <jinpu.wang@profitbricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/md/raid10.c |   18 ++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)

--- a/drivers/md/raid10.c
+++ b/drivers/md/raid10.c
@@ -1470,7 +1470,25 @@ static void raid10_make_request(struct m
 			split = bio;
 		}
 
+		/*
+		 * If a bio is splitted, the first part of bio will pass
+		 * barrier but the bio is queued in current->bio_list (see
+		 * generic_make_request). If there is a raise_barrier() called
+		 * here, the second part of bio can't pass barrier. But since
+		 * the first part bio isn't dispatched to underlaying disks
+		 * yet, the barrier is never released, hence raise_barrier will
+		 * alays wait. We have a deadlock.
+		 * Note, this only happens in read path. For write path, the
+		 * first part of bio is dispatched in a schedule() call
+		 * (because of blk plug) or offloaded to raid10d.
+		 * Quitting from the function immediately can change the bio
+		 * order queued in bio_list and avoid the deadlock.
+		 */
 		__make_request(mddev, split);
+		if (split != bio && bio_data_dir(bio) == READ) {
+			generic_make_request(bio);
+			break;
+		}
 	} while (split != bio);
 
 	/* In case raid10d snuck in to freeze_array */


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from shli@fb.com are

queue-4.9/md-raid1-10-fix-potential-deadlock.patch

                 reply	other threads:[~2017-03-24 15:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=14903677918123@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=colyli@suse.de \
    --cc=jinpu.wang@profitbricks.com \
    --cc=neilb@suse.com \
    --cc=shli@fb.com \
    --cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).