Hi Ritesh, Does the attached patch helps? Thanks, Srinivas On Tue, 2017-04-04 at 00:44 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > Adding Stable, LKML and IIO MLs. > > Hello Hongyan, > > Do you have any feedback ? With the bisected commit reverted, I've > been > successfully running the machine without any issues. > > Ritesh > > > On Sat, 2017-04-01 at 08:14 -0700, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote: > > Hello Hongyan, > > > > Can you check the findings of Ritesh? > > > > Thanks, > > Srinivas > > > > On Sat, 2017-04-01 at 14:07 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > > > Hello Srinivas, > > > > > > With the Linux 4.10.7 release, I have encountered a regression > > > introduced on my > > > Lenovo Yoga 2 13, for the ITE Rotation Sensor. > > > > > > > > > rrs@learner:~$ lsusb  > > > Bus 001 Device 002: ID 8087:8000 Intel Corp.  > > > Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub > > > Bus 003 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0003 Linux Foundation 3.0 root hub > > > Bus 002 Device 006: ID 048d:8350 Integrated Technology Express, > > > Inc.  > > > Bus 002 Device 005: ID 0bda:b728 Realtek Semiconductor Corp.  > > > Bus 002 Device 004: ID 04f2:b40f Chicony Electronics Co., Ltd  > > > Bus 002 Device 003: ID 04f3:0303 Elan Microelectronics Corp.  > > > Bus 002 Device 002: ID 0bda:0129 Realtek Semiconductor Corp. > > > RTS5129 > > > Card Reader > > > Controller > > > Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub > > > 2017-04-01 / 14:04:49 ♒♒♒  ☺   > > > > > > > > > The ITE sensors do not feed any data on the 4.10.7 kernel. > > > Reverting > > > back to > > > 4.10.5, everything works back. > > > > > > > > > After a git bisect, the culprit reported is: > > > > > > Bisecting: 0 revisions left to test after this (roughly 0 steps) > > > [6c2aab07d12436af1cd8d9ac1d117a442cc91eec] iio: hid-sensor- > > > trigger: > > > Change get > > > poll value function order to avoid sensor properties losing after > > > resume from S3 > > > 1 > > > > > > Can you please review my findings to confirm that it really is a > > > regression bug > > > ? > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Ritesh > > >