From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: paulus@ozlabs.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "powerpc: Don't try to fix up misaligned load-with-reservation instructions" has been added to the 3.18-stable tree
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2017 20:34:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <149254047124020@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
powerpc: Don't try to fix up misaligned load-with-reservation instructions
to the 3.18-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
powerpc-don-t-try-to-fix-up-misaligned-load-with-reservation-instructions.patch
and it can be found in the queue-3.18 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From 48fe9e9488743eec9b7c1addd3c93f12f2123d54 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2017 14:56:05 +1000
Subject: powerpc: Don't try to fix up misaligned load-with-reservation instructions
From: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
commit 48fe9e9488743eec9b7c1addd3c93f12f2123d54 upstream.
In the past, there was only one load-with-reservation instruction,
lwarx, and if a program attempted a lwarx on a misaligned address, it
would take an alignment interrupt and the kernel handler would emulate
it as though it was lwzx, which was not really correct, but benign since
it is loading the right amount of data, and the lwarx should be paired
with a stwcx. to the same address, which would also cause an alignment
interrupt which would result in a SIGBUS being delivered to the process.
We now have 5 different sizes of load-with-reservation instruction. Of
those, lharx and ldarx cause an immediate SIGBUS by luck since their
entries in aligninfo[] overlap instructions which were not fixed up, but
lqarx overlaps with lhz and will be emulated as such. lbarx can never
generate an alignment interrupt since it only operates on 1 byte.
To straighten this out and fix the lqarx case, this adds code to detect
the l[hwdq]arx instructions and return without fixing them up, resulting
in a SIGBUS being delivered to the process.
Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/align.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/align.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/align.c
@@ -808,14 +808,25 @@ int fix_alignment(struct pt_regs *regs)
nb = aligninfo[instr].len;
flags = aligninfo[instr].flags;
- /* ldbrx/stdbrx overlap lfs/stfs in the DSISR unfortunately */
- if (IS_XFORM(instruction) && ((instruction >> 1) & 0x3ff) == 532) {
- nb = 8;
- flags = LD+SW;
- } else if (IS_XFORM(instruction) &&
- ((instruction >> 1) & 0x3ff) == 660) {
- nb = 8;
- flags = ST+SW;
+ /*
+ * Handle some cases which give overlaps in the DSISR values.
+ */
+ if (IS_XFORM(instruction)) {
+ switch (get_xop(instruction)) {
+ case 532: /* ldbrx */
+ nb = 8;
+ flags = LD+SW;
+ break;
+ case 660: /* stdbrx */
+ nb = 8;
+ flags = ST+SW;
+ break;
+ case 20: /* lwarx */
+ case 84: /* ldarx */
+ case 116: /* lharx */
+ case 276: /* lqarx */
+ return 0; /* not emulated ever */
+ }
}
/* Byteswap little endian loads and stores */
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from paulus@ozlabs.org are
queue-3.18/powerpc-don-t-try-to-fix-up-misaligned-load-with-reservation-instructions.patch
reply other threads:[~2017-04-18 18:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=149254047124020@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=paulus@ozlabs.org \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).