From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: jbainbri@redhat.com, davem@davemloft.net, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "ipv6: check raw payload size correctly in ioctl" has been added to the 4.10-stable tree
Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2017 08:23:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <14934469948431@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
ipv6: check raw payload size correctly in ioctl
to the 4.10-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
ipv6-check-raw-payload-size-correctly-in-ioctl.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.10 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From foo@baz Sat Apr 29 08:22:40 CEST 2017
From: Jamie Bainbridge <jbainbri@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2017 10:43:27 +1000
Subject: ipv6: check raw payload size correctly in ioctl
From: Jamie Bainbridge <jbainbri@redhat.com>
[ Upstream commit 105f5528b9bbaa08b526d3405a5bcd2ff0c953c8 ]
In situations where an skb is paged, the transport header pointer and
tail pointer can be the same because the skb contents are in frags.
This results in ioctl(SIOCINQ/FIONREAD) incorrectly returning a
length of 0 when the length to receive is actually greater than zero.
skb->len is already correctly set in ip6_input_finish() with
pskb_pull(), so use skb->len as it always returns the correct result
for both linear and paged data.
Signed-off-by: Jamie Bainbridge <jbainbri@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
net/ipv6/raw.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/net/ipv6/raw.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/raw.c
@@ -1174,8 +1174,7 @@ static int rawv6_ioctl(struct sock *sk,
spin_lock_bh(&sk->sk_receive_queue.lock);
skb = skb_peek(&sk->sk_receive_queue);
if (skb)
- amount = skb_tail_pointer(skb) -
- skb_transport_header(skb);
+ amount = skb->len;
spin_unlock_bh(&sk->sk_receive_queue.lock);
return put_user(amount, (int __user *)arg);
}
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from jbainbri@redhat.com are
queue-4.10/ipv6-check-raw-payload-size-correctly-in-ioctl.patch
reply other threads:[~2017-04-29 6:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=14934469948431@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jbainbri@redhat.com \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).