From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from esa4.hgst.iphmx.com ([216.71.154.42]:20324 "EHLO esa4.hgst.iphmx.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754921AbdEDP1D (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 May 2017 11:27:03 -0400 From: Bart Van Assche To: "hch@lst.de" CC: "linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" , "James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com" , "scott.bauer@intel.com" , "jack@suse.cz" , "hare@suse.com" , "martin.petersen@oracle.com" , "stable@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Avoid that scsi_exit_rq() triggers a use-after-free Date: Thu, 4 May 2017 15:26:37 +0000 Message-ID: <1493911596.2692.2.camel@sandisk.com> References: <20170503180911.24326-1-bart.vanassche@sandisk.com> <20170504073013.GA3684@lst.de> In-Reply-To: <20170504073013.GA3684@lst.de> Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, 2017-05-04 at 09:30 +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Please just add a flag to ->flags instead of adding a whole new field. >=20 > Otherwise this looks good to me. Hello Christoph, Thanks for the feedback. I will make the proposed change and post a second version. Bart.=